Sunday, January 25, 2009

2234 Timely Advice

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Advice for the times:


------------------

You can make posters at http://obamiconme.pastemagazine.com/. Mine didn't come out as clearly as their examples - I don't know how they get all that white on the faces. I get red with every photo I try. If I bring the white up, all features disappear. You do have to register, but it seems innocuous enough. And they produce a ".gif", but there are free conversion sites available to make it a ".jpg". Pardon my lack of enthusiasm.




.

Saturday, January 24, 2009

2233 State's Rights? And other bits.

Saturday, January 24, 2009

The Vienna Convention on Consular Relations provides that arrested aliens have access to diplomats from their home country. The U.S. ratified it in 1969, including an annex to the treaty under which the U.S. agreed to let the world court resolve disputes over interpretation.

The U.S. insists that foreign countries afford Vienna Convention privileges to Americans in trouble overseas, under the provisions of this treaty. However, the U.S. does NOT ITSELF honor the treaty, because, believe it or not, states are under no obligation to honor the treaty. That's really stupid.

The issue heated up recently when the International Court of Justice unanimously found that the U.S. had violated the Hague tribunal's July order to stay the execution of José Medellín, a Mexican convicted in Texas of murder. The court had called for additional judicial hearings to be held to weigh whether he was entitled to a new trial or other relief because local police failed to provide him consular access after arrest, as required by the treaty.

Texas simply ignored the order.

The federal administration says they can't force individual states to obey. So foreign nationals who run afoul of state laws may not be (in most states are not) allowed consular access. That's kind of like if you were arrested and jailed in Yemen for a crime you did not commit, but you were not permitted to contact the U.S. Embassy, because you'd been arrested and charged by local police, not the national police.
The controversy "makes the U.S. look like it's putting itself above the law," said Diana Shelton, an international law professor at George Washington University. "And it's also putting U.S. nationals at risk" when they travel abroad, she said, because foreign governments can cite U.S. noncompliance should they deny consular access to Americans.

Spokesmen for Mr. Obama couldn't be reached for comment.

Frustrated by their nationals being jailed without consular access, foreign governments have increasingly turned to The Hague to pressure Washington to comply. After Paraguay and Germany won world-court cases against the U.S., Mexico in 2003 asked the Hague tribunal to find the U.S. in breach and vacate the death sentences of dozens of Mexican nationals in several states.

In a 2004 opinion, the court stopped short of Mexico's request but directed the U.S. to conduct additional judicial hearings to see whether the inmates were entitled to new trials or other relief.

The decision sparked a battle early in President George W. Bush's second term between hard-liners who considered international law largely irrelevant [!!!! emphasis mine] and moderates concerned that perceptions that the Bush administration was ignoring Washington's international obligations would undercut U.S. diplomacy.
Full Wall Street Journal story here.

Ok, I understand most of it. What I don't understand is that bit about not being able to make states comply. It was my understanding that federal law supersedes state law, and that should include treaties, shouldn't it? I mean, could Michigan declare war on Canada? Well, ok, but you know what I mean.
A) It shouldn't require a law from Congress to force states to recognize treaties, and
B) if it does, then why isn't there such a law already?

-----------------------------

Repeating a question I still don't have an answer to. I should ask Sheldon, from "The Big Bang Theory". It's my understanding that it's our yellow sun that causes Superman to have super strength and super powers.

It's my understanding that you build muscles by working them hard.

Now, if Superman has super strength, so to him nothing is heavy, how did he manage to build big muscles?

Just something I don't understand.

-----------------------

Another old question. I've never understood the part in the Irish blessing, "...may the road rise up to meet you...". It's supposed to be good, but I don't understand why. Doesn't it mean that there should be no downhills? Aren't downhills the easy parts? It still leaves uphills, maybe even steeper ones if the road keeps rising. If you fall flat on your face, the road rose up to meet you. That's not good.

I don't understand.

-------------------------

I forgot something important. As strong as silk fiber is when it's new, it weakens with age.

I've purchased many very beautiful especially soft old silk saris to use for sewing projects. Yesterday I was holding one up to myself to judge how sheer it was, and I accidentally stepped on the edge. When I pulled it up a little higher, it tore. The scary part - I was barefoot, and didn't even feel the pull. It's really fragile. Like cobweb.

---------------------------

Something I've just discovered: I have twice now hidden this journal by changing the URL. It's pretty easy with blogger. But they don't warn you that when you do that, it breaks all the backward links in posts pointing to previous posts.
.

Friday, January 23, 2009

2232 Sportsmanship

Friday, January 23, 2009

A friend is all het up over the Covenant School/Dallas Academy high school girl's basketball game. Wants the Covenant coach fired. Briefly, the Covanent School stomped the hell out of Dallas Academy, beating them 100-0. Dallas has a total of 20 female students (120 male), and only 8 on the girls' team. They haven't won a game in four years. At halftime, the score was 59-0. The Covenant coach kept the starting players, and they continued to push throughout the second half. Their supporters were also rather loud.

Ok, it wasn't very sportsmanlike. In fact, it was pretty much nasty and unnecessary. The Covenant school authorities and the coach have apologized, and have voluntarily forfeited the game.

I think I know what happened. In girls' high school basketball, 100 is rare, and I think they just saw their chance to "steal the baby's lollipop" so to speak. Temptation is a bitch.

------------------------------

This all reminded me of the first, last, and only sports event I attended at my college. The college won the state wrestling championship year after year. Nationally famous for wrestling. It was THE sport at that school.

No other college in the state had come anywhere near them - until this particular year. This evening was the final evening of the state championships, and it was being held at our school, and the other team was very very good. It wasn't going to be the usual walk in the park.

So everybody went to the gym that afternoon. I didn't want to go but got talked into it. Things went back and forth, tied, until it came down to the last match. The winner of that one would win the championship for their school, they could take it away from us for the first time in more than a decade. (Or something like that. Anyway, it was a very big deal.)

The guys faced off, and grappled a bit, and then the kid from the other school landed on the mat awkwardly, and we all actually heard his forearm snap.

A timeout was called, the kid went to the side with his coach, there was a lot of fuss and discussion, some kind of pneumatic splint was put on his arm (like a balloon, somebody said it was chilled), and then the kid went back out to the mat!

I couldn't believe it! He was going to continue!

So then they started again, and the wrestler from our school went straight for the kid's arm. And that's the way it went. Our guy grabbed the arm and twisted, pulled, bent, and pounded it. He wasn't even wrestling - he was just attacking the arm. The referee didn't stop it. It went on and on, and the kid screamed with every twist. "Our side" of the stands was chanting "Work on the arm! Work on the arm!" It was the most disgusting thing I'd ever seen in my life.

I was also standing and screaming, but I was screaming "Leave his arm alone! Stop! Stop it! Not the arm! Not the arm! If you can't beat a one-armed man fairly you don't deserve to win!"

When it went on and on I got hysterical, and friends dragged me out - with me still screaming the whole way.

For a long while afterward, there were people who wouldn't talk to me in the lounge. I was a traitor. Didn't I understand how important it was? They seemed to feel that the important thing was to win - that HOW didn't matter. There were very few people who agreed with me, and that troubled me for a very long time.

I blame first the kid's coach. The coach should not have left it up to the boy to make the decision, because the amount of pressure on the kid was enormous. The coach should have pulled the kid and taken the forfeit. He should not have allowed the torture to continue.

I blame our wrestler and our coach second. There's no reason that our wrestler could not have won without torturing the arm, because if he couldn't beat a one-armed man he didn't deserve to win anyway.

I blame the referee (or whatever he's called). He had the power to stop it, and didn't.

To this day, I wonder about the kid, and whether his arm healed ok. Or whether his arm has been messed up ever since. And I don't know or remember who won. It never was important to me.

----------------------

The worrisome registered letter waiting at the PO, that I worried about yesterday, turned out to be from an acquaintance in Australia. I don't know why it was registered.
.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

2231 I need to borrow a life

Thursday, January 22, 2009

I've got to start up some kind of life again. I do a lot of just sitting around waiting for something to happen.

Today I:
  • washed my hair
  • wrote an email to my sister
  • went to the grocery store for dry cat food, litter, and toilet paper
  • cleaned the litter boxes
  • read some internet stuff, nothing necessary, mind you
and, uh, that's pretty much it.

On the list, but not done:
  • read new dental plan booklet
  • search desk & floor piles for tax stuff
  • search desk & den files for name and address of the estate lawyer
  • pay bills
  • write to everyone I've owed notes to for the past six months
  • make dentist appointment
  • make doctor appointment
  • make vet appointment
This is not good. Sometimes days go by that I don't speak to any live person. Only 18 months ago I was pretty active. I've got to get involved in some activities again, but I don't know what. The volunteer group hasn't assigned me to anything since last spring. Maybe because they like to get new recruits involved? I'm pulling away from Mensa for a while, because a few people have been bugging me lately and I need to let the piles of crap erode a bit before I let them throw more on.

I somehow got on a contra-dance email list. Maybe I'll try that.

-------------------------

I found a slip in the mailbox that I have a registered letter (a large envelope) waiting for me at the post office. I'm worried. Really. I'm not expecting anything registered.
.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

2230 Is it just me?

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

I'm sure there are technical words to describe what I'm seeing, but I don't know them, except maybe for "manipulation".

You know how the tv spots have been trying to convince us that the February switch to digital is "because it's so much better"? (Um, like, as opposed to all the money to be made selling the old bands?)

It seems to me somebody is stepping that argument up a bit.

For at least the past six or eight months I've had sets that pick up both digital and non-digital, and up until the past month I didn't notice a lot of difference on most of the channels that I get on my rooftop antenna. I could watch channel 10, or 10.01. The non-digital (analog?) shows have been coming in sharp and clear. About the only difference I'd noticed with digital is that the digital colors were more intense.

Suddenly, there's a BIG difference. (Although now that I think about it, it's been happening gradually over the past month, not suddenly.) The non-digital looks like it's put together with blocks of color. Slabs. Painted with palette knives. Wide ones. Looks a lot like the old beginner-level Paint By Numbers masterpieces. People's noses look strange.

It looks terrible.

It didn't always look that bad.

Do they think people will look at it and say, "Oh, wow, yeah, digital really is a lot better! I didn't realize there was so much difference!"

Well, there didn't usta be that much difference!

I really really don't like being manipulated.
.

2229 Yup. Uh-huh.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

In a post yesterday, I wondered how long it would take for someone to complain that Obama did not take the oath correctly and therefore cannot exercise the duties of President. Not long, it appears.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

2228 Strange Mail

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

My mailbox was packed full this afternoon, eight packages. Two of them were unexpected and seemed odd. One was from Coldwater Creek, but it wasn't their usual overly large box and preprinted label - it was an envelope with the address and return address handwritten. The other was a small padded envelope with a return address for an unfamiliar business.

The small Coldwater envelope has a history.
I had ordered a sweater in gray from the discount outlet, and when it arrived, I loved it so much I went back and ordered it in red, using a coupon that pretty much covered its cost.
  • A day later I got an email that the red was out of stock, order canceled.
  • Ok. The coupon is about to expire, so I went back online to see what else I could get.
  • Hmmm. The red sweater is still listed. Relisted? So I ordered it again, plus a t-shirt.
  • A day later I got an email that the sweater is out of stock, but they'll send the t-shirt (free, 'cause the coupon covered it).
  • Early last week the t-shirt arrived.
  • End of story, right?
  • Wrong.
  • Yesterday I got a phone call from Coldwater Creek - first ever. The lady told me that the red sweater I had ordered is out of stock, and she assured me that I would not be charged for it.
  • Um, yeah, I know, ok.
  • Today I open the odd-looking envelope with the Coldwater return address, and in it is the red sweater,
  • and the usual invoice with my name and address on it,
  • and a note from a stranger that she had received it by mistake, that she had called Coldwater, and they had told her to send it to me. No return address for her.
Now what? Did I just get a free sweater?

The little envelope contained a pair of earrings. Two strange things about that - I haven't bought earrings in months, and this particular pair looked very familiar. I really like them. So I went online and looked for the business name on the return address, and it was an eBay seller.
  • I went to my eBay account to see if I had bought anything from her lately. Maybe she sent the wrong item?
  • Nope. I also verified I hadn't bought earrings from anyone lately.
  • I verified that none of the items I have purchased recently included free earrings.
  • Stumped.
  • I pulled up my feedback, and searched for feedback from her, any past dealings.
  • Ha! In April of last year, she left me positive feedback saying "So sorry they got lost in the mail. Wonderful buyer",
  • and I had left her positive "Lost in mail, honest seller offered refund",
  • and then I remembered!
  • I had bought earrings from her, they had never arrived, she offered a refund, but I didn't accept it because I wasn't certain that I hadn't simply mixed them up with others I had bought at about the same time, the cost wasn't high, and I was satisfied that she had offered.
  • I looked at the envelope, and the date on the USPS-printed stamp is "APR 03, '08"!
So I sent her an email (on one of her current listings) telling her they'd finally arrived.

Weird. I got something I think I didn't pay for, and something I paid for but thought I didn't get. Is this the way the year is going to go? If so, is that good or bad?
.

2227 Drumlines

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

The previous post sent me off to YouTube to find drumline videos. I've got the hunger again. This post is for me, a place to keep some of my favorites.

Some basics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl8PgmZ9iOc&feature=related

Florida A&M University on the field. Can't see the hands, but still good.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kc2M94mbMJk

This is a practice. Very bad sound, but very good example of what FAMU does better than anyone else - watch the hands! Precision! The Rockettes couldn't do it as well. Note that they're passing sticks to the guy next to them down the line without missing a stroke.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSIEM_hCphA&feature=related

Black Fire Percussion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9GdmSaW1L4&feature=related
These guys really have fun!

Cavaliers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eZ_Hqs4HkE
Thrilling! One of my favorites.

The Phantom Regiment:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnIFoCk-KSc&feature=related
The small city across the river is a stop on the junior corps tournament tour, and all day before the evening competitions, you find them on lawns, in parks, in parking lots all over uptown, doing exactly this. Note the feet moving. On the field, they move constantly, and FAST!, in and out of patterns.

Blue Devils:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2QixmwAl5Y&feature=related
Perfection. Notice the camera shots at rim-level - the sticks are all the same height!

Mississippi State University:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmCJTs7dFhs&NR=1

Santa Clara Vanguard:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bImbwdPu28
(They have a fault - they look down. They should never look down.)

The Cadets of Bergen County:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiYA_OVuDXU&feature=related

The Glassmen:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzJDxFvgptI&feature=related
(Past 3:10 is of no interest.)

.

2226 Speeches and Bands, and more free speech

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Yeah, I watched the Inauguration and the parade. I'm not going to wax philosophical. I just love me some marching bands.

There were a few things that struck me about the proceedings, though.

I was happy to see Barbara Bush looking so good. Even though she's ultimately responsible for unleashing so much havoc on the world, I've always liked her. She never simpered, never carefully chose her words. She's a strong lady.

The oath was strange. I'm sure Obama had memorized it, but the judge tripped him up. The Constitution, in Article II, Section I, says that “Before [the incoming President] enters on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.
I wonder how long it will take his detractors to point out that he has not yet taken the oath as written?

Ted Kennedy's luncheon seizure freaked everyone out. It really wasn't a big deal, folks. When you have a brain tumor, tiredness, stress, or even flashing lights can bring on a seizure. As long as it doesn't go into a series, it's not a big deal. It's just part of the package. They'll give him an extra jolt of his seizure medication, and that's that. I was a bit surprised when the hospital said he was awake and responding, though. That didn't feel true. After a seizure he should sleep, needs to sleep, shouldn't even be able to stay awake. After discharging like that, the brain needs to recharge.

I thought Obama's speech was great. It wasn't designed to get cheers, so I was amused when the first cheer went to the line: "We will restore science to its rightful place." Right on! (And what a slap....)

Lenox presented Obama and Biden with bowls. Bush got a hurricane lamp. Snicker. Chuckle. Snort. I wonder if that was on purpose.

I do love me some marching bands. Especially drum and bugle corps. Especially precision marching. Especially drumlines. Especially national champion drumlines. So when the Florida A & M corps paused in front of the reviewing stand, with the drums right in front of the new President, I bounced in my seat, "Yes! Yes! A salute!", but they just stood there a moment and then moved on. I was very disappointed.

Oh well. The national competitions are in a few days. Maybe I'll be able to see them on PBS or something.

There was one small incident that almost spoiled the day. After the ceremony but before the parade I went to the deli to get a sandwich. There were the three counter people, the owner in his office, a female customer paying for her stuff, and me. Then the customer said something about Obama.

It was kind of funny. There was an audible gasp, the three counter people turned and looked at me with big eyes, and the owner started out of his office. It was fairly obvious they expected a reaction from me. I hadn't heard what she said, but she kept talking, so I listened.

And yeah, I reacted. But I'm old enough and wise enough to know when someone is too stupid and too closed-minded to bother arguing with, so I dropped a fact or two, the others' heads whipping back and forth between us, I shrugged, and said "Well, we all apply labels that make us feel comfortable", and she scurried out before I could apply a label of my own.

Now, what's most interesting to me was the counter folks' suddenly getting so very worried about my reaction. I don't know why. Yeah, I'm dating The Man, but I don't think they know about him, unless the village is a LOT smaller than I thought it was (he and I had lunch in the tavern once many months ago). They know nothing about my politics, and I've never so much as snapped at anyone in there, so I don't have a reputation for temper.

Interesting. 'Tis a puzzlement.
.

2225 Blankie

Tuesday, January 19, 2009

Something I just remembered. Daughter's blankie. That's not what she actually called him, "blankie" is generic. I don't remember his name. I wonder where he is now.

He was a silky little coverlet that was nice to rub between your fingers when you sucked your thumb, and small and thin enough to carry around draped over your neck.

When he was about three years old, blankie was torn and tattered and badly stained. His fiber-fill was sticking out in tufts. I bought some silky fabric, folded blankie and sewed him into a tube of the new fabric, making sure to sew some of blankie's bits sticking outside the seams, so Daughter could still feel him and be assured that he was really in there.

In first grade she decided she was too old for thumb-sucking, and shortly after she gave up the thumb, blankie got relegated to a shelf in her bedroom, where he spent the next eleven years, alone, neglected, forgotten.

When she went to college, she took him with her.
.

Monday, January 19, 2009

2224 Laundry Day

Monday, January 19, 2009

Five loads of regular laundry today, and two loads of musty-smelling silk saris. I didn't have too much hope for an ordinary wash taking out the musty odor, but it did, so I'm happy.

The Big Bang Theory tonight is not a rerun, so I plan to watch that. Nothing else happening.

I'm bored with being bored.
.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

2223 Movies, sort of

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Nothing day. Really. I played with the cats, watched a 90-minute documentary, Crazy Love, about Burt Pugach and Linda Riss (they dated, he was obsessed with her, she found out he was married and broke up with him, he hired some guys to throw acid in her face, she was scarred and blinded, he spent 14 years in prison, he got out and was still obsessed with her, even his friends say he's certifiably insane, they ended up married, he takes care of her and she makes his life miserable, they're in their seventies now, and it's all true true true, also sick sick sick, and I don't regret the 90 minutes). Really weird coincidence, Linda reminds me so much of May - the way she talks, the things she says - and the woman with the thin whispy bangs looks and sounds like our friend NJ, it was all very strange.

And now I'm half-watching a terrible PBS opera while I wait for the Masterpiece Classic's presentation of "Wuthering Heights" to start. Oops, I just checked and that doesn't start until 9 pm. Maybe I should find something else to do.

We were supposed to get some minor snow sprinkles last night, nothing to speak of. Well, it's about three inches. And the snowthrower is in the shop again. The Aerio slid down the driveway when I went to the deli this afternoon, I was afraid she wouldn't stop at the end of the drive and shoot right on out into the road, we slid the last 15 feet and then stopped right at the edge, but then later she made it UP the driveway just fine. That's amazing. She's a good little car.

I'm bored.
.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

2222 Lingerie

Saturday, January 17, 2009

I've been experimenting with "sexy lingerie", an area in which I have had, up until the past year or so, no experience whatsoever. You know, like teddies, chemises, and corsets with stockings, and teenie panties, and lacy cat-suits, and so on. And ya know, I'm just not comfortable in any of that stuff. I told The Man last week that he'd once said he doesn't like "role playing", and for me, wearing stuff like that is play acting. I'm just a bit too shy for most of that stuff.

But over the past few days I've discovered something I find every bit as sexy, but completely ME! Peek-a-boo long gowns!

This arrived today:

The top and the entire left side is see-through, and it's incredibly beautiful. Well made. It's from Fredericks.com. I got it in black with light flowers, like this picture, and within minutes of trying it on today, I went back and ordered the same thing in merlot (wine) (which is currently on sale for less than $25).

If you're thinking about anything like this, like maybe for a special Valentine's evening, I highly recommend this gown. Most of the sexy gowns out there are chintzy and badly made, but this one is really nice. Just be sure to order the next size up from what you think you wear. All this kind of stuff runs small.

Thursday evening I wore this:

It's from FeelingUSA.com, and is also very well made. A bit more exposure in the cuppal area than the photo implies, but that's good. Gorgeous pale orchid color, nicer than the picture. On me, it brushes the floor in front, has a train in back. It seems to have made a good impression (either that or he'd missed me a LOT), but actually, I don't care. *I* loved it! This IS ME!
.

2221 Today's Favorite Jokes

Saturday, January 17, 2009

So, as I was checking into the hotel, I said to the desk clerk, "I hope the porn channel in my room is disabled."

"No," she said, "it's regular porn, you sick bastard."

---------------------------

Three guys walked into a bar...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...The fourth ducked.
.

2220 Ghost House; My Satchmo

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Visiting realty listings, through "It's Lovely! I'll Take It", I saw these photos of a house for sale in the St. Louis area.

It's amazing. It's a frozen slice of the 1950s! Everything. Furniture, tile, fixtures, colors, cabinets, everything, all in pristine condition. The refrigerator and stove look a bit post-50s, but sitting there in the garage, in all its glory, is the original stove - my Gramma's stove from the 50s! Also in perfect condition. It's amazing. The place should be a museum.

And then I read the description, and a chill ran up my back. "This awesome 50's bungalow, located on a quiet, cul-de-sac street on the Hill, has seriously never been lived in... at least on the main level. This ONE-OWNER home was resided only in the lower level during their stay here, so the main level has been frozen in time and perfectly preserved...."

Now, that's scary! The lower level is the basement. Cement floor and all. One big room. Who would buy and furnish a house, and then live in the basement? Someone so sick they wouldn't take a chance on juice spilled on a rug? Scratches on the tables? Accidents on the mattresses? Wear on the floors? Did they visit upstairs on Sundays and gloat over how perfect it was? And it's not like it was a single hermit - the description says that the only use of the stove was for 28 Thanksgiving turkeys, so there probably was a family.

The thought of what may have gone on in that house scares me.

It's for sale furnished. Look quickly. It may not be on the market long.

-----------------------------

Thursday evening The Man and I went to karaoke again. After the incredible year-end overtime he's had, he needed to relax. The usual crowd didn't seem to be there, so the rotation was short, he got to sing a lot, so he decided to play with it.

The first song he sang was Tracy Chapman's "Fast Car", and he sounded just like her. That one was for me. I love that song. His last song of the night (probably because it's hard on his throat) was Louis Armstrong's "What a Wonderful World", and he sounded just like him! It was incredible to hear that voice coming out of him.

The Man is utterly amazing in a lot of ways.
.

Friday, January 16, 2009

2219 Bits

Friday, January 16, 2009

From around the internet:

The UK Kennel Club has changed dog breed standards, moving away from characteristics that are not healthy for the animals, like schmushed noses that cause breathing problems, heavy skin folds, and so on. I wonder how many generations it will take for the progeny of today's champions to meet the new standards. (I'm also wondering what will happen to all last year's very expensive puppies. Talk about a bad investment!)

"SOME of the hottest results in the nascent field of social neuroscience, in which emotions and behavioral traits are linked to activity in a particular region of the brain, may be inflated and in some cases entirely spurious." Damn. And I'd been following that stuff with interest. Aren't there standards for research?

"They" are getting closer to a cloak of invisibility. Cool. Which reminds me - there have been several books about people being invisible, always men, by the way, and I (who has a problem with suspension of disbelief anyway) couldn't get into them, because hey, this is a guy who wakes up one morning and finds himself invisible, but it never occurs to him to head straight for the nearest undressing/sleeping females? And really, isn't that the first thing they'd think of?

A discussion of a lawsuit indirectly implicating (possibly) Trent Lott and others in an attempt to (possibly) bribe Mississippi Judge Bobby DeLaughter, led me to wonder how the judge's name is pronounced. My immediate choice was to rhyme with "daughter". "Laughter" feels wrong. I wish I knew. And why are laughter and daughter pronounced differently, anyway?

--------------------------

The Man found this sign in the restroom of a tire store today, sent me photos from his cell phone. The sign scared me (don't even think about the waste basket).


By the way, I'm in love again.

---------------------------

Found in this blog, early November, 2005:

"Sometimes you can't really know what someone is saying to you. You hear the words, but sometimes the words carry a meaning different from their dictionary definition. If you have no other basis for interpretation, you interpret from your own base. In an intimate relationship, the only way to fully understand the other person's messages, or lack thereof, is to understand their motivations, how their mind works.

If you don't understand that, you don't have an intimate relationship. You're just skimming along the surface."

It's still true.
.

2218 Not Safe for Work Update

Friday, January 16, 2009

The video in the immediately preceding post is no longer there. I suspect they were getting too many hits, bandwidth overload. If you look quickly, you'll find it here.

...and if that one's gone, try searching for "durex get it on" in YouTube.com. Pick one of the 31-second ones.
.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

2217 NOT SAFE for work

... but funny. It's an ad campaign, but you'll probably never see it in the US.
http://superfad.com/player.php?project=251&item=566
.

2216 Hearse and Tea

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Suzie the Aerio is now at the automotive spa getting an eyelash transplant. The rental place gave me a new black PT Cruiser. Nice interior, all kinds of fancy options, but it looks like a hearse!. There's something strange about the steering, too. Normally I handle the steering wheel very little, very steady. This thing feels like it needs constant correction. I felt like my tail was wagging all the way down the road.

I had a cup of tea in a mid-scale Italian family restaurant last night that pretty much freaked me out. I was with friends who were eating, but all I wanted was tea. It was one Lipton teabag in a mug (not even a real teacup) of not quite hot enough water, into which I added one packet of sweetner. No refills offered.

$1.95

Were they kidding me? And I'm supposed to tip, too?

I don't understand.
.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

2215 Tie Those Guys Down!

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

I don't know about other states, but in NY if a workman is injured while working on your property, you can be sued, even if you didn't create the dangerous condition and are not at fault. As the lawyers' commercials say, "...entitled to more than just workmen's compensation." What they mean by that is "you". (Your homeowner's insurance, or personally if the insurance is inadequate.)

The contractor is required to provide all necessary safety equipment, but if he/she doesn't, or if it is provided but the worker chooses not to use it, then the property owner is liable, too.

So in NYS, I guess I'm supposed to know what the dangers are, what equipment is required, and watch the workers every minute to ensure they're using it? Isn't that asking more than is reasonable?
.

2214 How to get out of jury duty

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

If you can't get your doctor to agree that you're sick, and you can't get your employer to swear that the safety of the nation depends on your presence, there's still one option available and (almost) completely under your control.

Stink.
.

2213 Blogs That Bug Me

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Nah, I'm not gonna list them, but I'm sure everybody has a candidate or two. They're the blogs that are really good, interesting, informative, or funny - until the blogger gets a contract for stuff based on the blog. Then the content changes to constant flogging of the book (or calendar, or mugs, or lecture/signing tour, or whatever).

Boo. I feel so used and dropped. Sucked in and spit out....

Do they realize that the thousands of regular readers (based upon whom they got the contract) don't need to buy the book? We have read the blog!
.

Monday, January 12, 2009

2212 Hungry Turkeys!

Monday, January 12, 2009

The turkeys are hungry. The storm about a week or ten days ago laid down an ice layer, and I guess they're having trouble scratching through it. I cleared snow from the driveway yesterday, and in a few places I went past the edge of the driveway and cut into the crust over the grass.

This is what I found this morning:

The turkeys have been digging for good stuff, probably wild cherry pits, maybe bugs. They've dug a pretty deep trench there.

This is my foot, and turkey tracks. Those aren't the largest tracks out there, just the most clear. Some of the tracks are almost as long as my foot. They're big birds.

I'll look for cracked corn next time I'm in the village, before they dig up more of the lawn..

---------------------

I had a long list of things that had to be done today, and got very little of it done. I spent over an hour on the phone with May, trying to convince her that our friend NJ is not dying, she simply doesn't want people to know where she is (especially May, but I didn't tell her that) and that the day May called the police to go to NJ's house and ensure that she was not dead on the floor, the police did NOT "break down the door". I was there, and I know what happened. May is only 2 years older than I, but she's morbid. She's waiting to die.

She's also heard of hearing, and phone conversations with her are painful. You have to repeat yourself a lot, and you'll be in the middle of an explanation and she'll interrupt and talk over you as if you were not speaking at all. Beyond the hearing problem, I don't think she really "hears" anything, anyway. Nothing gets through or past what's already in her mind. She also tells the same stories over and over. Aaaaagh! Sometimes when she calls and I'm not in a mood to deal with her, I just let the machine pick up. I don't have to call her back, because I don't think she remembers having called.

I feel very bad about all of that, because she is, at heart, a good person, and she's so very alone. I know that if I needed help, she would do everything she could. Almost all of "the group" has pretty much shut her out already, abandoned her. Someone will say "May called yesterday...", and you'll see or hear the eyerolls. In a group, sympathy is offered. Nobody ever calls her to see how she is. I hate the whole situation, but then, she'll call, and I let the machine pick up.

I am a bad person. Sometimes. I guess.

Then Daughter called. She was upset about something that had happened, and I was on with her for about an hour, talking her down off an emotional roof. I think she's ok now.

All I got done from the list was getting someone to look at the car windshield wipers. I took it to the guys I trust most. Yeah, they're screwed up, more than just a belt or gear slipping. It may be a "tweak" fix, or it may require a part, they'll know better after they open the box. I have an appointment to drop the car off there Wednesday. Enterprise will pick me up at the service place Wednesday morning, and I'll have a rental car for however long it takes.

I hate when things get complicated.
.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

2211 Awards

Sunday, January 11, 2009

The 2008 Darwin Awards are here. Enjoy.

Also, there's two days left to vote for your favorite blogs in the 2008 Weblog Awards polls. I've voted for a few of my favorites (Michael Totten in the Mideast and Africa category, and PostSecret in I forget which category, and Cake Wrecks in Food, for example). But better than voting is the opportunity to check out the nominees, which theroetically should be some of the best of the best.

In the category "Best Hidden Gem" (described as blogs no body much knows about) I found "Dizzying Intellect", which I've spent much of this evening enjoying.

If you want to find some good blogs, wander on over there to the awards link above. When you click on a category, it'll take you to the nominees list and voting page for that category. Links to the individual blogs are toward the bottom of that screen. (Unfortunately, you can't see which ones are highest scoring until after you vote, but so many thousand votes are out there already that a random vote won't hurt.)
.

2210 Snow Sunday

Sunday, January 11, 2009

My car's windshield wipers are messed up. A few weeks ago, on a Saturday afternoon when I planned to drive to New Jersey in messy "winter mix" weather the next day, I accidentally tore the rubber when they were frozen down and I pulled them to release them from the ice. I had to go buy new wipers before the trip.

Since then when I know frozen stuff is coming, I raise the wipers so they're up in the air and won't get frozen down.

But, I'm short, and it's difficult for me to reach the passenger-side wiper. I think I may have twisted it one of these times trying to get it up or down. Now suddenly they aren't working. Sometimes one or the other doesn't go up at all, sometimes one goes halfway while the other goes all the way, and they ignore each other, work randomly, and crash into each other. Something inside is slipping or something. I hope the weather and the roads stay dry until I can get it fixed.

I cleared the driveway this afternoon from last night's storm. The snowthrower still isn't working right. It'll start, but I have to keep the choke almost full open or it stalls, and it doesn't have much power. It if tip it up even an inch or so to get the hood off the ground to turn it, it threatens to stall. And if it stalls away from the reach of the electric cord to restart it, I'd be in trouble, because I'm too short to pull the starter cord all the way, and it's too heavy for me to push it up the driveway myself.

I guess I'll have to have it checked out again, but I have to find a snow-free week, because I really don't want to be without it when it snows.

Yeah, Mother is unhappy today.
.

2209 Warning!

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Do not, under any circumstances watch this video!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oGFogwcx-E&feature=related
Memorize the URL, and no matter who sends it to you, don't watch it, especially if you have anything in your stomach.

It's the Microsoft ad for their new Songsmith application. It's real. The download for the sample application is at http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/projects/songsmith/. (Or you can just go to Microsoft.com and search their website for "songsmith".)

If I had any Microsoft stock, I'd sell it. They've lost their minds.
.

Saturday, January 10, 2009

2208 The eBay Necklace Dispute

Saturday, January 10, 2008

PayPal has ruled in my favor on the necklace. I got the email yesterday:
We have concluded our investigation into your case and have decided in your favor.

You have indicated that a partial refund of $31.42 USD would be satisfactory.

If the seller's account has insufficient funds to complete the refund owed to you, please be assured that we will take appropriate action against the seller's account, which may include limitation of the seller's account privileges.

...

No further action is required by you at this time.

So, I'm waiting for the refund ("partial" because she had already refunded the shipping charges because it took her several weeks to get around to mailing it).

She currently has 130+ items listed, all "Buy-It-Now" with "Immediate Payment Required" through PayPal, so I know she has the money in her account or will as soon as she sells another item or two, and she won't be allowed to withdraw any until my claim is satisfied. So I'm waiting.

Since mailing the necklace to me, she has not responded to any of my emails, she didn't respond to the PayPal inquiries, and the phone number listed with both eBay and PayPal has been disconnected. I am unable to contact her.

Actually, I didn't want a refund so much as the four missing rings. I said that in my emails to her, and in my PayPal complaint. But now, since I'm getting a full refund, I have a moral dilemma.

I feel guilty having both the necklace and the refund. I feel like I should return the necklace, but I'm not sure the listed address for her is valid. I guess I could write to her, snail mail, and tell her that I'd like to send it back, but need to verify her address. Beyond the moral issue, I've got a feeling she's pissed, and if and when I start selling on eBay, I don't need her or her friends retaliating by doing to me what she perhaps thinks I did to her.

Opinions?
.

2207 Possible or Impossible?

Saturday, January 10, 2009

Arthur C. Clarke's three laws of impossibility:
  • "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong."
  • "The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."
  • "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
(Interesting short discussion of three levels of impossibility here.)

Physics and science aside, even we common folks have to be careful when evaluating what's possible and what's impossible.

Judge Judy often decides that since a reasonable person (she herself) would not do what the witness claims was done, the witness must therefore be lying, because what he or she claimed was impossible. And she does shout the actual word "impossible".

My father and Project Blue Book decided that since there was a possible, reasonable, terrestrial explanation for what a witness had seen, that must therefore have been what the witness saw, and therefore there is and has been no such thing as extraterrestrial visitation. It's impossible.

Houdini set out to prove that seers and seances were bunk, and he did so by replicating seance events by non-supernatural means, and concluded that because he could do the same thing, all seance events must therefore have been faked. Impossible.

The fallacy of course is in concluding that just because there's a reasonable explanation, just because the event could have happened in a reasonable way, then it must therefore have happened that way. That's not valid.

I'm not saying all Judy's witnesses are truthful, or that little gray men are flying around teasing us, or that ghosts come on command to shake tables. That's not a valid conclusion, either.

I'm just saying that just because there is a possible reasonable explanation for something that seems impossible does not mean that it IS the only explanation. It could be, but it doesn't inherently contain the proof that it is. Simply making sense doesn't make something true. It's relatively easy to prove something is possible. It's very difficult to prove something is impossible.

I'm tempted to go so far as to say that it's impossible to prove something is impossible, but that's where we have to bring the science and physics back in (keeping in mind that they don't know everything, and they've made some wrong calls, too).

Now, with "improbable", there we have some wiggle room.
.

2206 My UFO

Saturday, January 10, 2009

I have mentioned before that in 1964 and into 1965 my father was on several month's temporary duty at Wright Patterson AFB, where he was assigned to Project Blue Book. My mother and younger siblings were living on a SAGE base in eastern Pa., where my father had been the commander. I was in college, about an hour's drive from home.

My father came home about every other weekend, and he brought Project Bluebook materials with him. The folders would lie on the dining room table, complete with SECRET stamps.

On several weekends when I came home and my parents were out, I leafed through them.

They contained detailed reports from the witnesses, the location and history of other incidents in that area, background of the witnesses, atmospheric and weather conditions at the time, reports of all military, commercial, and private air traffic, and all weather balloons etc. within x miles, all satellite positions, records from commercial and military radar, and so on.

I asked my father about the files. It wasn't hard to get him to talk about them. He thought it was the best fun he'd ever had.

His job was to read through all the material, and then come up with an explanation based on that information, that would stick. So he'd work out visibility distance, cloud patterns, wind directions, and so on, and then write an explanation of what it could have been, if this were just a bit west of the report, and if this were so, and so on. However, it was not written up as "what it could have been" --- it was entered in the file as what it was scientifically proven to have been!

I was not amused.

It's interesting that my father had been unable to explain my own UFO experience.

It happened a few years before the Blue Book assignment, when I was 15, 1960. He was the commander of the SAGE base then. The base was on the top of an isolated mountain in northeastern Pa., surrounded by a state park, a wildlife preserve, and miles and miles of nothing.

I used to spend hours with my dog in the fields and woods around the base. I didn't have a watch, but I knew the commercial flight schedules and directions, so I knew when a certain flight went over (Avoca to Chicago?) it was time to head home for dinner, and so on.

One summer day I was near the rifle range when I caught the glint of planes near the northeastern horizon. Odd. No commercial planes ever came from the northeast. There were three of them, close together, one in front, two flanking, in a perfectly clear sky. Three in formation seemed to say military. They were very bright, like the sun was reflecting off them. They were long and thin, too long for their width, like needles, and I realized I saw no wings, and heard no sound. They left no contrails, either. All of that made me think that they were very high. I watched them fly over, and then I realized that they had taken only 10 seconds or so to cross from horizon to horizon. Man, that's FAST! Either that or they weren't as high as I thought they were - but if they were lower shouldn't they have looked bigger, shouldn't I have seen wings?

A few minutes later, the commercial "go home for dinner" flight came over and I went home. My father was home, so I told him about these really fast planes, and asked him what they were. He called the guy on duty in the towers (two search, one heightfinder, and the SAGE block) and asked what had come over just before the commercial flight.

None of the radar had shown anything. My father went up to the base (we lived right next to the gate) to find out why not.

Later, I got pretty thoroughly grilled, because, of course, that's impossible. There was never any explanation. There were no radar tracks. My father told me I was nuts, and never to mention it again, and as proof that I was nuts he pointed out that planes traveling from the northeast to southwest at that time of day would not be lighted by the sun, they'd be silhouetted, therefore I'm nuts.

And that was that.
.

Friday, January 09, 2009

2205 Big Engineering and Financial Discoveries

Friday, January 9, 2009

When I buy new eyeglasses, I always get two pair, because I'm blind without my glasses. If I pack an overnight bag, the spare pair goes in. Usually I alternate wear occasionally, and usually, when it's time for new lenses I get one new frame, and have new lenses put in the better of the old frames. Last time, about two years ago, I got two new frames because I caught a good sale and both of the old ones were ratty.

However, since day one, one of the new pair has been unwearable. The thingies that sit on the nose HURT! They leave red welts on my nose, that will go to blisters if I keep wearing them.

I've taken them back twice, and the first time they just adjusted them (didn't help much) and the second time they replaced the pads with smaller softer pads. Still didn't help. Part of the problem is that they feel ok at first, but within two hours they get painful.

This morning I got the hurty pair out and decided I was going to fix them somehow. If I broke them trying, I wouldn't lose much because I can't wear them anyway.

I bent and tweaked the nose pieces six ways from Sunday, and they still hurt. It felt like the glasses were too heavy on my nose. So I weighed them. They actually weigh less than the ones that don't hurt. I thought about that a bit.

Why do they feel heavier? Because they press on my nose harder. But they aren't heavier. So why do they press harder?

Because the thingies that go over the ears are too tight! That pulls the nose thingies hard against my nose!

I straightened out the ear thingies so they just rest over my ears instead of grabbing them, and wow, I've been wearing them 8 hours now, and they're fine.

It took so long to figure that out because they never hurt my ears.

---------------------------

Interesting question. Suppose someone has been accused of some financial crime, say embezzling a gazillion dollars. Say that he is being sued in civil court for the missing money, and has been charged in criminal court with the crime. The civil court freezes his assets so he can't dispose of them before the case is decided. The criminal court is getting very nasty.

He needs to get two good lawyers, one civil, one criminal. He's rich. He ought to be able to afford great lawyers, and has a right to whatever he can pay for. Civil isn't too much of a problem, since any lawyer who isn't sure he can free those assets and get the guy off isn't one he wants on his side, anyway.

The criminal lawyer is the problem, and he needs him first. His assets being frozen, he can't pay a criminal lawyer up front. And the outcome of the civil case is likely to depend on the criminal outcome, because if he is found not guilty, the civil case will probably be dropped (although not definitely, as OJ will tell you, so he still needs the lawyer). Ye Olde Catch-22.

This is similar to the problem faced by Marc Dreier.

Not that I feel a whole lot of sympathy for him, but the situation has my head spinning.

He's innocent until proven guilty, right? And he's allowed the best criminal defense he can get, right? So is it fair to hamper his defense by freezing assets that are not yet proven to be ill-gotten?

Are a prosecutor and a civil lawyer allowed to arrange for assets to be frozen in order make it more likely to get a conviction? Isn't this collusion to hamstring a defendant? Is that ok?

It may be ok legally, but I don't think it's ok morally. You might argue that if the assets are stolen, it's right to ensure that he can't spend them before the rightful owner can get them back, but the counter to that is that until they are shown to be stolen, they're his.

-------------------------

Speaking of moral arguments, Piper advised me today to sell off a bunch of stock from one of my private accounts, stocks that have fallen, bank the money, and then buy back the same stocks after 30 days. That way, after the 30 days, I am in the same position as before, but now I have a huge capital loss to claim on my 2009 income tax.

My chin dropped. Shock. "That doesn't sound right!" It's ok, he said. Perfectly legal. The law just says you have to wait 30 days.

I told him it may be legal, but to me it sounds immoral! He and Vinnie looked at me like I was crazy. "It's not immoral. It's BUSINESS!"

Eek.

I've "lost" a few hundred thousand in this rotten market (I don't consider it really lost because I haven't sold any, it's all good stuff, and will all come back when the market recovers). But if I sold off all the losers, then bought them back, I could end up paying almost NO 2009 income tax without hurting myself at all.

Now, think about that top 1%, the multi-billionaires. If I could eliminate taxes without damaging my bottom line, what do you think they could do? And if they did it, what would that do to the market? And of course it would be to their enormous advantage if the market not only stayed low for a while, but even better if it dropped a little more.

So with the bailouts raising the federal deficits, taxes will have to go up for someone. That bill's got to be paid. Everybody thinks, well, raise the taxes on those folks who have more than they need. But ha ha! They've found a way to not pay ANY taxes!

Another instance of the core mechanics of our economic system - "Give to them what got, and make them what don't got pay for it." That's the way it was designed.

---------------------------

Which leads to a final thought: I don't understand why folks would trust someone named Madoff with all their money. (There's a joke in there, "made off with all their money", but I don't know how to write it.)
.

2204 The Before-Mommy

Friday, January 9, 2009

[This is all absolutely true.]

In about 1978, when Daughter was 3 years old, she was very verbal. She had been speaking in three and four word sentences at 9 months, and then when she realized no one but her Mommy could understand her ("yellow" was "eeoo", for example), she stopped. When she started up again at 2, she had a huge vocabulary, near perfect pronunciation, structure, and grammar.

I'd had three miscarriages and a stillbirth before her. I was afraid she'd be all I'd have (I was 31 when she was born), so she was a 100% natural birth, and I was very involved with her. She'd never at that point even been left with a sitter. She had never been exposed to anything that I wasn't aware of. She had been enrolled in a thrice-weekly program for exceptional children starting at 14 months, but even there I knew about everything she saw and did.

And I know that she'd never seen or heard of most of the things she told me about having seen and experienced before coming to live with me.

I was a bit surprised when one day I was starting supper, and she asked what we were having, and when I said "sausage", she said, "Oooo, I like sausage. My before-Mommy used to make that all the time."

Me: "Your before-Mommy? What before-Mommy?"
She: "The Mommy I had before I came to you."
Me: "You had a Mommy before me?"
She: (Impatiently) "Yes!" (Frustrated) "The Mommy I had before I died and came to you!"
Me: "Oh. You had a Mommy you lived with, and then you died, and then you came to me?"
She rolled her eyes, stamped her foot, and went off to play with the dog.

Now, keep in mind, she's three. This is the same kid who, more than a year later, burst into tears when she discovered I had once been a child - "But whooooo took care of meeeee when yooooooou were a baby?" I told her Gramma took care of both of us, and that satisfied her. To a child of three, what is now always was and always will be. So the idea of a before, especially where Mommy is concerned, is beyond inconceivable.)

The next time Before-Mommy came up I was putting something in the oven, and she said, "My before-Mommy would really like that oven."

Me: "She didn't have an oven?"
She: "Yes, she had one, but not like that."
Me: "What was hers like?"
She: "It wasn't iron. It was like clay, and it was shaped like this (arms swinging in a large high mound), and you put the bread in a hole here (shoving motion about chin high), and the fire goes in here (walking around to the other "side" and motioning low). Vegetables and stuff go in here (back around to the "front", motioning to a lower hole). No doors. Yours is a lot nicer. You don't have to build a fire."

Over the next year and a half we had many strange conversations. They were always initiated by her, always in quiet moments, usually when we were alone, but occasionally when her father was nearby and could hear. (Thank goodness, a witness!)

During these conversations, she looked and sounded older. Her voice was lower. Her whole aspect changed. She moved differently, tighter, commented on things a child her age wouldn't normally notice, drew conclusions beyond her age. Sat quietly and conversed.

I also quickly learned that when the conversation was over, it was over. Once she wandered away, if I went to her and asked about something she had just said, she didn't know what I was talking about. It was like she had "spells" when she remembered Before-Mommy, but outside those spells, when the spell ended, Before-Mommy not only didn't exist, Daughter had no memory of having talked about her! I pushed a bit once, and she burst into tears because she thought I was telling her she was adopted. I learned to move very gently, to get as much information as I could at her pace, on every occasion offered, before the spell ended.

I also learned that I couldn't ask a "wild duck" question. I could probe deeper into whatever she was talking about, could ask questions about whatever her chosen topic was, but if I tried to go beyond that, the discussion was over. For example, I never found out what her name was, and that was driving me nuts. Still does. But the moment to ask never came.

The following is what she told me, in bits and pieces, usually kicked off by something we were doing, over the next year plus. It was completely consistent, and the details were always the same no matter from what direction they were approached.

She, her mother, her older brother, and "Old-Pa" lived in a house in the mountains. It was all mountainy. Pointy. Lots of big wide fields, all around. (There was apparently no father? When I asked about a father, she looked like she didn't understand.) "Old-Pa" (the grandfather, I suspect) couldn't walk. He sat in a chair with wheels. (Like a wheelchair, like in the hospital?) No, a chair like in the kitchen, but with wheels on the bottom. Brother put the wheels on it. Brother took care of their "little camels" in the fields. (Little camels? I finally figured out from her descriptions that they were probably alpacas. That's very interesting, because llamas, alpacas, and vicunas are in fact related to camels, and in this life she had been exposed only to camels, so that's the word she used?) Her mother wore a man's big hat, and big skirts, "not pants, like you".

When Old-Pa died, the three of them moved into town. Their "house" was one large room, and all the houses were attached around in a square. The oven (which some ten years later I discovered was a perfect description of a clay beehive oven) was in the middle of the room. There was a door and a window with shutters in front of the house, and a door in the back that opened to a courtyard that all the houses used. She had been allowed to keep two little camels when they left the mountain (because she cried for them), and they were kept in the courtyard during the day (but they could go in and out), and in the house at night. Water came from a well down the street. That was her job, to go get water. Her mother didn't wear the man's hat any more.

There was something about her having injured her leg, and she had to use "crunches" for a little while, but I don't remember. She had a doll her mother had made for her.

Their house was really pretty, because it had painted vines and flowers and all kinds of stuff on the outside, all around the doors and the window. Her brother lived with them for a little while, then he went away to go to school to be a doctor. He bought an old car so he could come visit them a lot, but the car spent most of its time "in the car hoppital", so it wasn't much good.

She: "And then I got sick and died."
Me: "Do you know what made you sick?"
She: "No. I couldn't breathe, I think."
Me: "How old were you then?"
She: "Twelve. My brother came home, but he couldn't fix me. Then I died."
Me: (Treading very carefully) "And then what happened?"
She: (Nonchalantly) "I went to the waiting place."
Me: "Waiting place? What's it like there?"
She: "Oh, you know (No! I don't!), just a waiting place." (Waving her hand dismissively.)
Me: "What were you waiting for?"
She "Time to get born."
Me: "How long did you wait?"
She: (Rolling eyes, silly mommy) "There's no clocks there! I just waited 'til it was time, then I came to you."
Me: "How did you know when it was time?"
She: (Frustrated) "Because it was time to get borned!"
Me: "Why me?"
She: (Super frustrated) "Because that's! when! it was time!"
Spell over.

That was our last Before conversation. She remembers absolutely none of it, any of it.

I believe every word of it.

I think that's why she was able to tell me, because I listened and accepted, and didn't turn her off or tell her she was silly the first time she said something outrageous. I suspect many children with old souls come through with memories, but there's a small window when they are able to talk about them, that short period between *when they have the words* and *when the before fades*. And if they are discouraged, if the right now reality is imposed and insisted upon, the window slams closed.
.

Thursday, January 08, 2009

2203 Weird News

Thursday, January 8, 2009

I promised myself only one post today. I have stuff I have to DO! But the "news" that has percolated to the top today is just too good to pass up.

First, there's Joe the Plumber. He's leaving for Israel, with press credentials. Yeah. Google joe plumber gaza to read all about it.

Then there's the surgeon who donated a kidney to his wife a few years ago. Now she's filed for divorce, and he wants the kidney back. Google divorce kidney for that one.

New research has shown that those work-at-home offers have a 54 to 1 scam ratio. Wow. Who'd have guessed?

And the most shocking of all, researchers at multiple universities have concluded that the more a competitor practices, the better he or she gets. Groundbreaking discovery!
.

2202 Body

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Here's a photo, just 'cause I haven't thrown one in lately.

I've mentioned that the females in my family make muscles easily. The photo is Daughter, a few years ago. Dig those arms! I had to cut off her head because she doesn't want to be "exposed on the internet", despite the fact that this photo was in the newspaper. It was a big deal because it was her first solo marathon run, and Hercules met her at the finish line with roses, a ring, and the bended knee proposal, and reporters thought it was cute. (That's him next to her.)

It's one of my favorite photos because it's so HER. Number on her torso, roses in one hand, water bottle in the other, baggy shorts, muscles. That's my kid.
.

Wednesday, January 07, 2009

2201 Security Breach!

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

This could be serious. Simply announcing that someone has done it will ensure that someone else will try. Reported today by the Citizen Media Law Project:
The following post was submitted by one our loyal readers, Theo Karantalis.

MIAMI -- The familiar closed padlock icon that indicates a Web site is secure has been picked.

A Web security standard compromised by security researchers exposed a weak link in the system that could give hackers access to PCs.

At risk: all E-commerce and online banking transactions.

Researchers said that they used 200 PlayStation 3 video game consoles to defeat Secure Sockets Layer, or SSL, a security mechanism designed to prevent eavesdropping and guarantee Internet users that their connections are encrypted and safe.

If it worries you, use the link above to read the entire article.

.

2200 Get in line, fellas!

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Here's a good one from TMZ:
[Larry] Flynt (the "Hustler" guy) and [Joe] Francis (the "Girls Gone Wild" dude) are asking the government for a $5 billion bailout, claiming the adult entertainment industry has taken a huge shot to the face because of the downturn -- citing the fact that XXX DVD sales are down 22% from a year ago.
Read the TMZ article. It's short, and filled with snickers like the "shot to the face" above. I guess they're hoping for, in the end, the money shot from Congress.
.

2199 Cup O' Fat

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Over the past few days I've come across several references to Ramen noodles. Back when I was working in the litigation lab I often had either the noodles that come in the styrofoam cup or in the rectangular package when I couldn't take the time to go out for lunch. Haven't had them in years.

So when I saw the familiar cup in a half-box in the deli today, for 79 cents, I bought one.

For the first time ever, I read the package. I was surprised at the calories and fat content. They have a lot of salt, you can taste that right off, but I'd never realized how much fat they contain. It sure doesn't show.

In 300 calories in the cup, there's 13g of fat, or 35% of the daily value (whatever that means), and 1060mg of salt (44%), for a person averaging a 2,000 calorie diet.

I average closer to 1,000 calories, so that's more like 60-65% of my fat allowance, and 75% of the salt. In one little cup. A snack.

Wow.
.

Tuesday, January 06, 2009

2198 Up, Never Down

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Visited Piper today, to straighten out the 2007 NYS taxes. NYS still thinks I owe another $313. I paid it in November, the check was cashed, but they don't seem to have a record of it. Piper has made some calls, and has promised to have it cleared up by Thursday.

Anyway, he and I and another guy got into a discussion of local taxes. The town (in NY, that's a subdivision of a county) budget has gone up again by 8%, and Piper has heard that the tax bills (to be mailed out this week) are that much higher.

I don't understand.

There has been an enormous amount of construction in the town in the past few years. There's a huge condominium complex opening on the edge of the village - each unit selling for $500,000 (each!). A 100-house planned village was built just east of here. There's a LOT of building going on. I don't know who's buying the units, but they are selling. The builders are responsible for putting in the roads and utilities, and yes, I understand that they increase the cost of town services --- BUT --- they also increase the tax base!

So if the budget goes up by 8%, shouldn't the increase be covered by the increased tax base? Shouldn't the individual portion of the budget be coming down? Why is it necessary to increase everyone's taxes by 8%? It doesn't make sense to me.

We get to see the details of the budget, but we never get to find out how much was actually collected. We trust that no more was collected than was approved. It seems to me that if they increase everyone's taxes by 8%, AND the tax base has increased so that properties that didn't exist are now paying, then the total amount collected will be MORE than the 8% increase approved. Is that legal? And if so, where does the overage go?

I really don't understand any of this.

-----------------------------

Up, and never down, seems to be the usual.

About two years ago, when the prices of real estate was getting past ridiculous, the county reappraised everybody's property for tax assessment. (Although the assessed value of my house went up by 30%, it didn't bother me because as long as everybody's went up, the actual amount of my taxes would stay the same.) Now the prices are dropping precipitously, but will the county reappraise/adjust again? Yeah, sure.

The bad part is that when a house sells now at way below the assessed value, the sales value becomes the assessed value for taxes, so eventually those of us who don't sell, and are still taxed under the old (artificially high) assessed value, will be paying a higher proportion of the taxes. Not fair.

Remember along about the '70s or so, when something nasty was going on south of the border, and coffee and chocolate became very hard to get? And the cost of a chocolate bar went from 25 cents to 75 cents, AND they got smaller? Well, when the hostilities were over, the price of chocolate didn't drop. 'Member that? Same with sugar a few years before. Sugar never came back down.

And this summer, when gas was $4 or more per gallon, and all those folks started tacking on surcharges because "the cost of transportation has gone so high"? Well gas came down (one wonders why gas, but nothing else - we accuse Exxon of gouging, but not Hershey's?), but we're still getting hit with that surcharge. I've asked people why, and they look me straight in the eye and say, "Well the cost of transportation is so high...". Nah. They just got used to that surcharge and see no reason to give it up.

Prices are coming down now, but only for discretionary purchases, things that don't wear out, that you can put off buying. I hear it's a great time to buy a car. Unfortunately, it's not a great time to cash out investments to buy that car.

Especially when I've gotta pay taxes.
.

Monday, January 05, 2009

2197 From the Radio

Monday, January 5, 2009

Drove to Daughter's today, made Welsh cookies. I think this may be the best batch ever. We made about six dozen, I brought home half.

-----------------

Heard on the car radio: "... want to see scrutable evidence ...". Wow! I know the word "inscrutable", but I'd never heard "scrutable" before. Makes sense, though.

Of course I looked "scrutable" up when I got home, and it's defined as "not inscrutable", which I find funny - double negative, you know.

But in the car, my immediate thought was, well, if I immediately understand something, did I "scrute" it? Would that be the root? So I looked that up, too, and the closest verb is "scrutinize", which is the process of determining that something is scrutable, I suppose.

I find it odd that all those words with prefixes and endings doesn't seem to have a root word in English.

-----------------------------

A pair on an NPR show were giggling about how Caroline Kennedy used the phrase "you know" over 200 times in a 30-minute interview. They talked about how annoying that can be, and said that the way to stop someone doing it is to, every time they say "you know", answer quite seriously "Yes, I know."

Sorry folks. That doesn't work. Ex#2 used to say "right" almost as punctuation. He'd breathe it softly after every phrase, or anywhere a comma would go, and at the end of every sentence. The average sentence had three to five "right"s in it. Annoyed the hell out of me. I told him about it and he denied it, so I started responding "Right." or "No..." every time he said it.

Then one day he told me that my interrupting him to agree or disagree with him all the time was very distracting. He still denied that he was saying "right", didn't believe me when I told him, even after I continued to respond to his "right"s.

Sigh.

So "Yes, I know" won't work on Ms. Kennedy. People with verbal tics don't know they're doing it. She'd just think you were being rude, and if you keep saying you know everything, why should she continue talking to you?

--------------------------

Also heard on the radio - Waterford is declaring bankruptcy, is looking for a buyer. SIL Hercules works for a division of Waterford. It was announced to the employees over the intercom this morning. No one knows what it means yet.
.

Sunday, January 04, 2009

2196 Old Thought on Terrorism

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Cleaning out more junk from the den, I found a slip of paper with a thought from a few years ago. I still don't have the answer.

President Bush said that any country that supports terrorism (in that "axis of evil" speech) is itself guilty of terrorism.

At the time, the British had been enduring decades of the IRA blowing up civilians. Americans were supporting the IRA, with implicit US government approval.

What does that mean?
.

Saturday, January 03, 2009

2195 Ouchy Back

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Way back, at least a week before Christmas, in expectation of snow and not wanting to carry bags of recycle material down the driveway, I loaded the back seat of my car with cut up cardboard and grocery bags full of newspaper, "smooth" paper, and mixed glass, metal, and plastic. The recycle center is open on Wednesday and Saturday mornings. I intended to dump the load the next time it was open.

Between then and now I hadn't been able to catch them open. Either they were closed for snow, or they were open but I was snowed in, or I overslept, or or or ....

In the meantime, more bags and cardboard got tossed in.

By this morning I was unable to see out the back window. I really need to get to the recycle center! I even set the alarm last night.

I woke up this morning with twinges in my lower back. I know that feeling well. It says, "be good, be careful, no lifting, or I will bite you".

The recycle center has high-sided construction dumpsters. Dumping the stuff in means I have to lift the heavy bags higher than my shoulders.

I thought about it. I went. I dumped. I am now wearing the back brace.
.

Friday, January 02, 2009

2194 Weird Visits

Friday, January 2, 2009

Yeah, another post. Like I don't have anything else to do.

Something weird has been happening lately. I mention something, and then almost immediately this blog gets a visit from someone associated with that something.

Like, I mentioned C0ldwater Creek in the previous post. Within an hour, I got this in the Sitemeter stats:
Domain Name
coldwatercreek.com ? (Commercial)
IP Address
204.120.131.# (Coldwater Creek)
ISP
Sprint
Location
Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : Idaho
City : Sandpoint
Lat/Long : 48.3432, -116.4536 (Map)
Language
English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System
Microsoft WinXP
Browser
Firefox
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5
Javascript
version 1.5
Monitor
Resolution : 1680 x 1050
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit
Jan 2 2009 5:54:34 pm
Last Page View
Jan 2 2009 5:54:34 pm
Visit Length

Page Views
1
Referring URL

Visit Entry Page
http://thesilkentouc...tory-from-those.html
Visit Exit Page
http://thesilkentouc...tory-from-those.html
Out Click

Time Zone
UTC-8:00
Visitor's Time
Jan 2 2009 2:54:34 pm














Yup. C0ldwater Creek visited.

Wow.

Ok, I can understand companies getting alerts when they're mentioned on the internet, but I'd think they'd just be concerned with general trends. Why on Earth would they actually visit a poor little colonial outpost like this?

I don't understand.
.