Monday, September 15, 2008

2007 A Letter dated 3/19/99

Monday, September 15, 2008

When I visited Rochester to help get the house ready to sell after Jay's father died, I found three letters in his files that I had written to him during Jay's illness.

I was happy to find them, because I had lost all the copies of letters and emails stored on the computer for the entire period of Jay's illness - and that was pretty much the whole record.

I've decided to type them into this journal. They'll be safe here for a while. "[---]" indicates today's edits.

--------------------------------

March 18, 1999

Dear Folks (Dad and Sisters),

I've been making Jay make the "I'm fine" calls because it's good for him, and you'd be more likely to believe it if you hear it from him rather than me. He's shy about talking on the telephone, so I rarely listen in, so I don't really know how much Jay has told you about what's going on with him. His way of handling problems is to not think about it - ignore it and maybe it will go away. (My way is to research it until I know everything, and then club it until it runs away.) So I suspect that you have got very little detail from him.

So, in case you're like me and want all the details, here it is. For every bit of bad news there's good news.

Last October, he had a seizure after stepping out of the shower. EMTs, ambulance, stretcher, another seizure in the emergency room, three days in the hospital. They could find no clear reason for the seizures, but they put him on Dilantin and told him he couldn't drive for six months. An MRI later in the week showed a tiny pinpoint of light on the right side (which could easily have been missed if it had fallen between the "imaging slices"), which was tentatively diagnosed as possibly a minor stroke.

At the end of January he had a followup MRI. The pinpoint was now about two inches across. We saw the neurologist in [town], Dr. G[---], the next day, a Friday, and on Monday we saw the chief of neurosurgery at Albany Medical Center, Dr. P[---]. Dr. P[---] wanted to operate immediately, but Jay had been taking baby aspirin for his heart, and we had to wait until the aspirin was out of his system, so the surgery was scheduled for Tuesday of the next week. I didn't think about it then, but now I am impressed with how quickly all these otherwise "impossible to see" people became available to us.

The initial diagnosis after the surgery was malignant mixed glioma, in the right parietal region. "Mixed" means that there were several kinds of cells involved. The Glia is the supporting tissue of the brain. Dr. P[---] removed the tumor plus a margin of clear tissue, down to "microscopically clean" edges. But you can't look at every single cell, so although he feels very positive, he can give no guarantees. The pathology report says high grade oligo-astrocytoma. Oligodendrocytes and astrocytes are the cells that make up the glia. High grade means it is aggressive (growing fast) and invasive (growing into and replacing normal brain tissue), and looks very different from normal cells. The tumor had vascular parts, solid parts, necrotic areas, and fluid areas, a very odd tumor altogether. (If we had sent Jay to the lab with orders to design a tumor, this is exactly what he'd come up with.)

That's all bad news. The good news is that we got one of the best brain surgeons in the state, and it was a miracle that the tiny pinpoint must have hit a critical area that threw off the seizures. Jay had no other symptoms, so without the seizures, we may not have caught it until too late. The doctors said it's obvious that the part of his brain invaded by the tumor was not functioning before the tumor, because it sure wasn't after. Dr. P[---] had warned me that he would have to remove possibly functioning tissue also, and he could not predict the results - the most likely being left-side paralysis. They are now amazed that he seems not to miss six or eight cubic inches of brain. After a five hour surgery, within a half hour out of the operating room he was helping the nurses set up his CPAP machine (for his sleep apnea).

The nurses, by the way, loved Jay. In a lot of ways he's never grown up. He still has a ten-year-old's curiosity and enthusiasms (not to mention sense of humor). And when anybody comes at him with a needle, he even looks ten years old. In a guy so big, it's endearing.

The oncologist, Dr. W[---], is not as positive as the surgeon, but I guess that's the nature of her job. She says the good news is that this type of tumor is local and does not metastasize. The bad news is that it always recurs. She recommends chemotherapy, specifically a phase 2 clinical trial of intensive high-dose chemotherapy with bone-marrow transplant. Standard chemotherapy can buy time, but will not eradicate the tumor remnants. Intensive chemo is considered the best treatment because the blood/brain barrier makes it difficult to get the standard chemo dosages into the brain, and with intensified more will get through. That's the theory, anyway.

I've been reading up on it. The protocol is currently the preferred treatment for brain cancer, and is in phase 2 clinical trial at Harvard/Mass. General, Sloan-Kettering, and several other cancer centers. (It's the same protocol that has recently been tried for breast cancer, now in the news because it doesn't seem to be clearly better than the standard treatments for breast cancer, and given that it's twice the cost and some people don't survive the treatment itself, a forthcoming report is going to "unrecommend" it.)

The prognosis for brain cancer is, in general, absolutely miserable (it's the most common childhood cancer, and the childhood and geriatric numbers depress the totals). No one will give a specific prognosis for an adult individual because the brain itself is so unique for each person, besides the usual differences in timing, location, condition, operability, makeup of the tumor, etc. According to my reading, the astrocytes tend to be the more aggressive, and are not very responsive to chemotherapy. A pure astrocytoma is very dangerous. The oligodendrocytes are usually susceptible to chemo. The doctors don't know why, but when you go after the oligos in a mixed tumor, it kills the astros, too. Jay and I theorize that maybe the bad oligos put out a chemical that encourages the astros to grow, and without the bad oligos, the bad astros die off. So Jay's lucky there, too. His tumor had a "significant oligo component". (By the way, if you happen to come across any brain tumor material, there's a tumor called a "grade IV glioblastoma multiforme" (GBM), whose description is very close to Jay's tumor. It will give you nightmares. I couldn't sleep for three nights after coming across it on the internet, but the difference is in the structure of the nuclei, and that definitely is not what he has.)

From what I've read, we've been through the easy part. The protocol he has signed up for is rough.

It's been six weeks since his surgery, and I'm starting to get anxious -- the tumor grew so fast between October and January. The first three weeks after surgery they said he had to be completely healed before chemo, since chemo kills dividing cells, and will halt all healing. Then, his jaw hurt. The temporal muscles had been cut in surgery, so some ache there was to be expected, but when it didn't stop, we discovered it was an abscessed tooth. It took another two weeks to accomplish a root canal. He couldn't start chemo with a pocket of infection. This past week we've been waiting for the results from some special blood tests (why couldn't they have been ordered earlier?) and meeting more doctors. I hope we really get moving next week.

First step will be collection of stem cells from Jay's bone marrow. They will teach me how to give him injections, and then I'll be giving him shots of some stuff for several days that will cause his marrow to release stem cells to the blood. Then they hook him up to a machine and circulate his blood through to collect the stem cells (apheresis), and store them for later.

He will then go through two cycles of intensive PVC chemotherapy (Procarbazine, CCNU (aka Lomustine), and Vincristine, some intravenously and some by tablet). A cycle is about 42 days - the first 29 days getting some form of chemo followed by 13 days recovery time. They gave us a list of side effects, then pointed out that since he'll be getting about 25% higher dose than normal (the "intensive" part, designed to get a larger proportion to the brain), "many of them are expected to occur". Jay seems to be most worried about loss of hair (the man is emotionally involved with his BEARD!) I'm most worried about his immune system being depressed. And if he's too tired to work, that will mentally depress him (he doesn't get paid if he doesn't work - not a problem, really, but the idea will depress him.)

After two cycles they'll look (MRI) to see if the chemo is working -- i.e. no tumor growth. If there is growth, they'll stop the chemo and go to some other therapy, probably radiation (which seems to scare Jay) or a biological therapy. If the brain seems to be responding to the chemo, then we'll continue with one or two more cycles. As we go along with the cycles, the chemo will be damaging his bone marrow, he'll become more and more susceptible to infection, and will need more and more protecting - much more than the average chemotherapy patient. I intend to be fierce. By the third cycle he will be my prisoner!

There are dietary restrictions associated with one of the meds - I don't have it at hand right now - but no bananas, aged cheeses, pickles, certain breads, certain meats, etc. In the later cycles, he won't be able to have fresh vegetables (and especially not raw, because of bacteria), anything with a possibility of fungus, and so on.

He will then (assuming he has passed all the tests so far) enter the hospital for a few weeks. He'll be in a private room in an isolation ward, with air exchangers to eliminate germs, and a lot of restrictions. I will be allowed to visit, but they'll practically sterilize me before I'm allowed in. No other visitors. They will give him a high dose of Thiopeta, a powerful chemotherapy drug, intravenously, for 72 hours. This will unfortunately totally wipe out his bone marrow, leaving him with no immune system. About four days after that, they will give him his stored stem cells back. The stem cells travel to the bone marrow, settle down, and start raising families again. They will keep him isolated until he starts producing leukocytes and stuff again, usually two or three weeks.

Then he comes home, and the waiting time starts.

The mortality rate nationally for infection after this procedure is 5%. Albany Med has done something like 300 marrow transplants of this type over the past 5 years (mostly for leukemia), and have lost between 2 and 3% to infection, but have lost none at all in the past two years. Jay's immune system will be depressed for up to a year after. He will have lost all of his hard-acquired immunities. He'll need to have all his baby shots again. He'll have to be protected from bacteria, fungi, and viruses for up to a year afterward. There's a one-in-three chance he'll get shingles sometime in the first three months. There will be another, stricter, diet to avoid fungi and bacteria. The GOOD news is that he'll probably lose all his allergies, too.

He'll have MRIs every three months for a year, then every six months thereafter.

As I said, Jay's way to handle all this is to ignore it all. I just tell him where he has to be and when. I'd be happier if I could get him into imaging and stuff, but his way is to bury himself in work and computer games. The first few weeks, THE TUMOR was the only topic of conversation - everything came back to it - every other story on the news was someone else with cancer. It got to where I declared cancer-free days. No mention allowed! Now, we're pretty much back to normal. I'm nagging him to fix the hot water heater and do the taxes, etc., before the chemo starts. I'm worried that he will get tired. He plays computer games. Like I said, back to normal.

So that's the plan. Now I turn you back to Jay for periodic updates.

Sincerely,
[Silk]

-------------------------------------

This letter kicked off some memories. Like the day after his first surgery, when we first met the oncologist, Dr. W[---]. She said the tumor was "mixed. That means different kinds of cells." I asked "What kind of cells, exactly?" and she answered, "That's not something you need to know. It wouldn't mean anything to you anyway."

Well, when she said that, Jay tensed, gasped, his eyes got big, and he glanced sideways at me. She obviously didn't know who she was talking to. NOBODY says something like that to ME! I didn't explode. I just said "Why don't you tell me anyway." She did, and she quickly learned that I not only understood, but I was capable of drawing conclusions. I guess they don't see that very often.

Jay went through three cycles of the intense chemotherapy, but we never made it to the marrow transplant. He had none of the expected side effects. None. His immune system was only slightly depressed. All of which leads me to wonder if it was intense enough. After the third cycle they did an MRI, and he had no sign of recurrence, so they scheduled him for the transplant about six weeks hence. But about four weeks into the six weeks, I noticed something odd about him, and requested another MRI. It had been only a month since the previous MRI, but Dr. W[---] had learned to listen to me, so they did the MRI - and the tumor was back. Instead of the marrow transplant, he had another surgery, followed by a different chemotherapy.

Reading about the diet reminded me of an incident a few years after Jay died. I had gone to Rochester to visit his father. One of his sisters was also visiting. She and I were in the grocery store, in the fresh vegetable section, when she made some comment that my not feeding Jay fresh vegetables probably weakened him and contributed to his recurrence. I totally lost it. I screamed at her and cried. That absolutely isn't me to react like that, but she had no right to say anything like that. She knew NOTHING about what we were dealing with!
.

Sunday, September 14, 2008

2006 Sat Nite Live

Sunday, September 14, 2008

In case you missed it last night, S. Palin & H. Clinton, together:
http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/video/clips/palin-hillary-open/656281/
.

2005 Tasting

Sunday, September 14, 2008

I went to Taste of New Paltz today. A large number of local restaurants set up booths serving their specialties.

"Taste" my eye! It was $5 to get into the fair grounds, then you had to buy tickets at $1 each to trade for food. Most of the food took 2 or 3 tickets.

I'd never been to this particular event before, but I had been to "taste"s at the Culinary Institute of America in Hyde Park. There you paid a bit more to get in, but then all the goodies were free, and they were truly tastes, just a tiny bit, like a forkful or two, so you could taste 20 or 30 different things without filling up.

At New Paltz, I knew I was in trouble at my very first stop, pulled pork. An entire sandwich worth. At another booth I got New England clam chowder, a good 10 ounces. Then some delicious mixed mushrooms in a wine and garlic sauce on bread that soaked up the yummy sauce. I'm not a big eater. I always take doggy bags home from restaurants. Today I ate the equivalent of five full meals.

Of the fifty or so options, I chose well, I guess. Everything was very good.

The first person I ran into was Nat. He's like 6'9" tall and skinny. He was volunteering at ticket sales and was about to go back on duty, but Angie was about to come off duty, so I walked with him over to where Angie was. We got some odd looks. We do look strange together.

Angie and I wandered around booths and displays until she had to go back on duty. While wandering, we found Andie, also volunteering at a booth, and ran into The Pixie and her Dark Prince. I kept an eye out for Gypsy, whom I half expected to be there, but I didn't see her.

It's very unusual for me to see anyone I know at these things.

-----------------------------

It has been very cold at night lately. Days get into the low 70s, but that's not enough to warm up the house to get through the night, so Friday I gave in and turned the furnace on (threw all the switches, climbed ladders and swapped all the baffles and dampers, closed off water and opened up oil).

I expected today to be like the past few days, so I wore closed shoes and knee socks, slacks, and a 3/4 sleeve knit top.

When I parked at the fair grounds (an hour from here) it was already 87 degrees. When I left, it was 99 degrees. Midday I had sweat running into my eyes. I can't imagine what it was like for all those people cooking in the booths.

-------------------------------

I also got another Tarot reading at the Tasting. It was different in several aspects from the previous two, but all three readings have mentioned something significant happening with The Man in late October. On one hand, I'll be awfully disappointed when October passes with nothing significant happening, but on the other hand, whatever happens may not be good. "An offer will be made that I will turn down, and we will argue." (I can't imagine arguing with him. We don't argue. One or the other may get annoyed or angry, we explain our positions, one or the other apologizes and agrees to be more sensitive to that issue, and we reach some kind of compromise. No argument.)

All three also mentioned something significant happening with my house - major renovations (the A/C?) and/or probably a move. Hmmmm. I can't imagine moving, either.

So, stay tuned for late October.
.

Saturday, September 13, 2008

2004 One Church, Two Church, Three Church, Four

Saturday, September 13, 2008

I am annoyed. The Republicans made such a big deal over Obama's pastor. Why has there been no equivalent examination of Palin's church?

This, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-wilson/sarah-palins-churches-and_b_124611.html, is a rather long (and perhaps sensationalized) description of her church, the Wasilla Assembly of God, its connection to The Third Wave of the Holy Spirit (a.k.a. the New Apostolic Reformation, perhaps you are familiar with the movie "Jesus Camp"), a movement declared heretical by the Assemblies of God.

Even if you don't read the whole thing, watch the video. She's in it. I find the statement at the end, at about 9:06, about how "when you have defeated them, you must destroy them totally, make no treaty with them, show no mercy to them, ... smash their idols, break down their sacred stones...", to be especially frightening, particularly as applied to a person who could be someday at the helm, and who seems to think she is there as God's warrior, chosen and raised up to this task, and that war is "God's work".

Be afraid. Be very afraid.
.

Friday, September 12, 2008

2003 Powerful Packaging

Friday, September 12, 2008

I don't know whether it's that my hands are getting weaker, or packaging is getting stronger, but I'm having increasing difficulty opening wrappings and bags.

When I'm driving some distance, I often buy a bag of trail mix or peanut butter crackers to nibble on the way. These days, I have to have someone in the store open it for me. If I'm on the road already, I have to pull over and stop, and dig the knife or folding scissors out of the bottom of my purse to cut the bag open.

I bought a little bag of coffee candies, and had the clerk open it for me. What I didn't realize is that the individual candies were wrapped. Not so long ago, there'd be a little cut in the end of the wrapper that made it easy to tear. Or you could pull the lengthwise seam overlap and it would cause the end to open. Not any more. I about went crazy trying to chew those candies open.

On the trip to Minneapolis, we were given little bags of munchies on the plane. Nobody could get them open, and of course no one had a real metal knife or scissors.

Potato chip bags require scissors. If you manage to get a candy bar open by hand, it might be at the cost of the candy flipping out onto the floor. Those cardboard and plastic hanging thingies that toys and small hardware and cosmetic dohickies come in drive me crazy. Scissors don't work because of the odd shape. They're so tough utility knives are dangerous - the plastic just gives and bends when you saw at it. Mostly I get them open by picking at the cardboard on the back.

A lot of pills come in foil and plastic blister packs, with perforations between the individual doses. If they're just foil on the back, it's easy to push a pill through. But now they're adding a tough paper backing over the foil that you have to peel off first. I've been having fits getting that paper backing off. My Prilosec has a spot on the corner of each pill cache that isn't glued down, where you're supposed to start peeling, but you have to separate the pills on the perforations to get to the loose corners. A few weeks ago I noticed that suddenly the perforations don't work. I can't tear on the perforated part. I try mightily, and more often than not it tears randomly, which indicates to me that it's not weakness on my part.

I buy a lot of drinks in bottles that have the plastic safety wrapper around the cap. They used to have a perforated part, a "zipper", that made it easy to get the plastic off. Half the bottles I've bought lately don't have the perforations, or the perforations don't go all the way to the edge. That plastic is impossible to tear by hand. It just stretches, but not enough to slip it off. I've been reduced to chewing the cap off a bottle of iced coffee.

Is it just me? Has anyone else noticed it?
.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

2002 A dance video

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Nothing much happening today. It's been a long time since I posted a dance video, so here's one. This is Kami Liddle, at Tribal Fest 2008. Enjoy.

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPnVIW2d5vc]

P.S. - She's an entertaining dancer, but that tattoo makes it look like she needs to wear her belt higher, or shave. It's a little hard to get used to.

P.P.S - I HATE the music. Now I'm wondering why I posted this. Well, lower the volume a tad.
.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

2001 The Collider Collided

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

I warned folks many months ago about the Large Hadron Collider, and the possibility that it could create a black hole.

Well, they started on-line testing today. This link is a fascinating view of the interior of the collider: http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html. Scroll down a little so you can see both the interior and the outside.
.

2000 Word Cloud for August

From wordle, my word cloud for August's posts:


Click on the image to enlarge.
.

1999 Blog Recommendation

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

I'd like to recommend http://www.shoeboxblog.com/. It's a group blog from employees of the Shoebox division of Hallmark Cards. Those folks are slightly nuts.

There are about five posts a day, such things as strange thoughts, rejected card ideas, mini movie reviews, off-the-wall cartoons, etc. All very short. But the posts I like best are the daily "Newsdroppings". Today's Newsdroppings are at http://www.shoeboxblog.com/?p=2881. Check it out.

Either Hallmark doesn't know about the blog (especially the rejected card ideas - they're cringeworthy!), or they do, and if they do, it must be a great place to work.

Those people are slightly nuts.
.

1998 Deflecting Flack

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

I subscribe to the local Mensa Yahoo Group. Lately, several members have been posting emails or bits they've scarfed from websites, supposedly from people who know or have worked with Sarah Palin. One of them, the Kilkenny letter, is valid, but most are not.

One of the most ubiquitous is the list of books that she supposedly tried to get removed from the town library when she was mayor. That list is definitely fake, since no specific titles were discussed with the librarian, and several of the books on the list weren't even published until afterward. The list is actually simply a list of the most often banned books, which someone picked up and attributed to her.

After I had shot down several attacks (I wish people would check with Snopes.com before they go spreading rumors - it's NOT that difficult), I was afraid I was beginning to look like a Palin supporter, so I posted the following:

Just to clarify - I may be coming off sounding like I'm defending Sarah Palin. I'm not. I'm just anti-disinformation. The truth is damning enough.

In actuality, the woman scares me. I am insulted that the McCain campaign seemed to think that nominating just any woman would swing the Hillary Sisters of the Pantsuit. If they wanted a woman, there were plenty of better-qualified women out there to choose from. The darker part of me wonders if the man who divorced the loyal but disfigured wife for the beautiful heiress wasn't swayed by charm and appearance.

Palin reminds me of many people I've run into - the socially and politically astute people who set goals, and then move from position to position to reach those goals, without really caring for the institutions they use along the way. They climb on people, they get other people to do the work for them for which they take credit, but so charmingly nobody resents them. It has always amazed me the way they seem to always be in the right spot at the right time, always saying the right thing to the right people. It's a skill that results in personal success - until they finally get to the point where their social and political skills aren't enough, where actual performance and knowledge are required, and then it all falls apart.

But the falling apart usually comes with a golden parachute, so they still win.

Maddening.

Silk


Speaking of golden parachutes, the CEOs of disgraced Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each got 13 to 15 MILLION in severance. Um, weren't they the ones responsible for the debacle? Under what theory do they deserve that? Bond holders will be paid, but stockholders, who have already lost 90% of their investment, may get the shaft.

The stock may go back up, but not for a long time.
.

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

1997 List/Group Experience

Everybody has probably seen this before, I know I have, but it's still funny. I belong to a few Yahoo Groups, and have subscribed to a few interest lists/forums, and this really does happen.

--------------------------
How many list members does it take to..........

Change a light bulb........

  • 1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed.
  • 14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently.
  • 7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs.
  • 7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light bulbs.
  • 5 to flame the spell checkers.
  • 3 to correct spelling/grammar flames.
  • 6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... Another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid.
  • 2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp".
  • 15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct.
  • 9 to post that this group is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a light bulb group.
  • 11 to defend the posting to this group saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this group.
  • 36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty.
  • 7 to post URLs where one can see examples of different light bulbs.
  • 4 to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URLs.
  • 3 to post about links they found from the URLs that are relevant to this group which makes light bulbs relevant to this group.
  • 13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too". [These are the ones that drive me crazy!]
  • 5 to post to the group that they will no longer subscribe because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy.
  • 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
  • 13 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs".
And finally, 1 group lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.
.

1996 He don't look nuthin' like me

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Yeah, ok, trash TV is on all afternoon. Doesn't mean I'm watching it, but it's on in the background. And I am so tired of hearing baby-mommas saying "He looks just like him!" and prospective fathers saying, "He don't look nuthin' like me!"

I want to tear my hair out. Babies look like themselves! Looks have nothing to do with anything.

-------------------------

I wore a new Indian scented attar oil yesterday**. On our walk, Peter asked me what I was wearing, said he liked it. Very unusual. He mostly doesn't notice.

After the group dinner last night, Roman (who had been sitting next to me during dinner by default, not choice) walked me out to the parking lot, and stuck around to chat for a good half hour. It sorta looked a couple of times like he was debating going for a hug.

I'm going to wear that oil a lot more often, I think.

[**"Prema", sandalwood and rose, available at www.ramakrishnanandasgifts.com, wholesale only. It had been sent as a gift from one of my favorite sari dealers.]
.

Monday, September 08, 2008

1995 Mom's Caps

Monday, September 8, 2008

Walked with Peter this morning. Perfect weather.

I don't know what made me think of it, it's not something I've thought of in years, decades even, but I've been thinking about a weird habit? characteristic? anomaly? whatever the word I'm looking for - about my mother.

She couldn't keep caps on anything, especially small caps.

Back when we used fountain pens, her nibs were always dried up, because the first time she used a pen, the cap disappeared.

She used to buy packages of Bic ballpoint pens, the kind with the separate caps. There'd be ten or twelve of them lying around, and none of them worked when you needed it, because none of them had caps, and they all dried up. We'd get her click-type ballpoints, and they'd dry up because she never clicked the point back into the barrel, and the points got all dust-fuzzy.

She hated the felt tip and nylon tip pens, because they bled all over everything, because they didn't have caps.

Bottles of ketchup and salad dressing sat in the refrigerator with twists of foil on top, because the caps had disappeared. Soda went flat.

The toothpaste tube in the kids' bathroom had a cap. The toothpaste in our parents' bathroom never had a cap.

This was true for quite literally everything! I would get so frustrated with her, because when none of her pens would write, she'd borrow mine "just for a moment" and it would come back with no cap. "Where's the cap?" "I don't know. Was there one?"

Her house was always clean and neat. There was no clutter. My parents were used to moving every three years or so (Air Force), so they traveled light. And yet those caps disappeared. Evaporated into thin air. Mom would have a pen in her hand for five minutes at the kitchen table, didn't move from the table, and yet the pen's cap would disappear. Not on the table, not on the floor, not in the trash, nowhere. And we'd never see it again. You'd think we'd find a bunch of them when we cleaned, but we never did.

Somewhere in some other dimension, there's a huge pile of my missing socks - and a small heap of bottle, tube, and pen caps.
.

Sunday, September 07, 2008

1994 American Pie

Sunday, September 7, 2008

For several decades I've been arguing with younger folks, and party to discussions with older folks, as to the meaning of the verses of Don McLean's "American Pie". McLean himself has never explained, and has never agreed to any interpretation, knowing, I guess, that to explain would detract. And then he'd have to get a job.

This video is wonderful. It's unauthorized (in that Don McLean hasn't said yea or nay), so it's one interpretation, but I found it fascinating.


[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsZFiMo8TIc&watch_response]

This is an updated version of Kim Komando's Video of the Day today.
.

Friday, September 05, 2008

1993 Power Paradox

Saturday, September 6, 2008

Several things happened today that I don't understand.

On Thursday, I checked several weather sites to find out what today and tomorrow would look like. Daughter and Hercules were planning to go camping at Ricketts Glen this weekend, and they'd invited me to hike the falls trail with them on Sunday. TV weather and everyone else said it would pour today, everywhere, Ricketts Glen and here and NJ, thunderstorms, much nastiness. I warned the kids. Not only would there be rain, but even if Sunday was nice, after storms the falls trail would be both spectacular and unhikeable. Daughter wanted to go anyway, "if my underwear isn't already damp before I put it on, it's not camping", but Hercules pointed out "it's a hurricane!" So they didn't go.

We've had a few sprinkles.

I don't know whether I'm annoyed or pleased.

-----------------------------------------

We lost electricity at 11:20 this morning. I was on the laptop, and it went smoothly to battery, so I unplugged it in case the power came back up with a surge, finished what I was working on, and then put it to "sleep". I figured that if the power wasn't back up in a few hours, I'd shut it down.

The power returned within the hour. I plugged the laptop in and pushed the "mommy's back" button. I got a message about "resuming windows", a glimpse of a cursor, then a black screen. No whirring. No blinking. Nothing.

**After a while I held the power button down for a while - emergency off - gave it some time to think about its sins, then turned it on again. The screen turned a few shades of gray and pale blue, then went black. No whirring, no blinking, nothing. Repeat from ** twice more. Think about where I'd go for service. Wish I'd got that external hard drive working.

And then it came up as if nothing had happened. Firefox even resumed my previous sessions.

I don't understand.

--------------------------------------

When I was running the (groundwater-based) A/C, I had only a trickle of water from the faucets. I turned the A/C off about a month ago, but the water never recovered beyond a slightly thicker trickle. It was dribbling in the bathrooms, and worse in the kitchen end of the house, where the A/C is located, so I figured that the pipes were full of silt from it running constantly all summer at low pressure. I was afraid I'd have to get a plumber in and have the pipes blown.

When the electricity is off, there's no well pump, and no water at all.

When the electricity came back on, I turned on the faucet in the kitchen, and it burped, sputtered, and then exploded. I've got water! Full force!

It's full of silt, so I can't use it for anything beyond washing my hands, but damn, I've got water again!

Why? What happened? What did the power going off have to do with it?

I really don't understand at all.
.

1992 Just Passing It Along....

http://video.aol.com/video/cialis/2000456/?icid=VIDURV08

1991 Nuttin'

Friday, September 5, 2008

No post yesterday. Nothing to say today. Them doldrums, I guess.
.

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

1990 State Tax Woes

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

I have a business name (a DBA) that is doing no business, but New York still wants me to file a sales tax report every year. All it says is that I made no sales and I collected no sales tax. It has said that for about five years now. Well, Angel, the CPA, didn't send the forms in on time this year, so NYS has billed me for $50 in sales tax, "based on the average previous taxes paid". Um, the average of 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 is 50?

I complained to Piper and Angel, it was supposed to happen automatically, and the Angel made some calls, and he says it's all taken care of, NYS has agreed to forgive the $50.

Unfortunately, NYS doesn't seem to be aware of that, and is continuing to bill me, and the latest letter is threatening legal action.

I talked with Piper about it this morning. I told him that I have no doubt that the Angel made the call. But it seems like the state tax people will say just about anything, but if they don't feel like making the note in the file, or following up, they don't.

The year after Jay died, my extimated NYS income tax payments were creditied to Jay's account, even though the forms and checks I sent had my SS# and name, which was different from Jay's. There was absolutely nothing to connect my payments to Jay, except for the fact that we had previously filed jointly. So at the end of the year, when I got the statement saying that I had made no estimated tax payments, I freaked. They had all been credited to Jay. Who was dead. And whose name and number were on nothing I had sent.

It took eight or so calls to figure out where the money was, and to get it transferred to my SS#. At first, they tried to refuse to move the money from Jay's account to mine, because he hadn't given them permission to do so. I calmly pointed out that I hadn't given permission to have my payments credited to his account, and besides, HE'S DEAD!!!!!

Believe it or not, the same thing happened the next year. My name and SS# on the form and on the checks. They again arbitrarily credited my payments to Jay.

I was telling Piper about this, and he told me a worse story.

He owed an additional $800 on his 2007 NYS income tax. Since his 1040 had been electronically filed, he sent a check separately. He received a bill from the state for $500 owed on the 2007 taxes. He called and told them he'd paid $800, and where did they get the $500 number, anyway? The clerk said she'd check and put him on hold. When she came back, she said no, he owed $500, and there was no evidence that he'd sent any $800 payment.

He pointed out that the check had been cashed by NYS. She asked that he send a copy of the front and back of the $800 check.

He did so.

And the state used the info on the copy of the check which he had sent to prove he'd paid, to electronically debit his bank account for $500. He's fighting it. He's into his fifth or so call now.

These people scare me.
.

1989 Doldrums, and other stuff

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Titles:
I am amused by some of the titles people choose for their blogs.

My own, for example.

It started out as "Moraine", on AOL journals. A moraine is a pile of mixed rocks dropped by a glacier, and I think it did sort of suit, but it was rather esoteric.

When I moved to Blogger, I changed the title to "I Don't Understand". I liked that, because it was so very apt.

When I had to move the blog and go into hiding for a while, I changed the title to "The Silken Touch". I like it as a bunch of words (and there are men who think it fits), but it doesn't really suit the blog because I snipe and complain a lot here. Not exactly a silken touch, even though sniping and complaining here releases me to be more silky in real life.

I'd like to go back to "I Don't Understand", but I won't, because I don't like it when other people keep changing the titles. I forget who they are. I lose continuity.

.... I changed my mind on the course of this post. I'm not going to comment on specific titles, mainly because I'm not able to think of synonyms to disguise them. But I'm thinking mainly of those that, like "The Silken Touch", set up expectations in the title that just aren't met in the content. It must be awfully hard to live up to some of those titles.

A little humility is a good thing.

-------------------------------------

The Doldrums:
This entry, Medical Matters #1 :: The Furious Compassion of Diligent Dr Payne, from La Bête, is a perfect description of what I call the doldrums. A kind of loss of motivation. Not exactly depression, because I still enjoy things that drift past. I'm sort of in doldrums these days. With me, it's sort of like I've stopped moving, and I'm waiting, waiting for something to happen, a breeze to come up and move me on.

--------------------------------------

Today:
My nose and sinuses are still complaining, and I'm coughing a lot, but the cold medicines are doing nothing. I stopped at the pharmacy and bought a sinus-dryer-upper, and that's working better. (If you could hear me now, you'd wonder what "worse" must be like.)

Lunch with Vinnie and Piper. I had a bowl of very good cheese broccoli soup. I rarely eat soup (the only kind I like is "cream of"s and bisques), and although today's soup was very good, with lots of nice big pieces of broccoli, it reminded me why I rarely eat soup. When it was finished, I felt empty. Soup just doesn't fill me. Lunch? What lunch?

---------------------------------------

Frustration:
There's a woman in M3nsa that I've had some run-ins with. She's a drama queen, I mean ultra drama queen - to the point of faking asthma attacks when anyone passes on the street with a cigarette within 20 feet of her. Faking! Which pisses me off. She's loud and demands attention. When another friend and I were entering menopause, she decided she was, too. She was 35 at the time, and had hotter flashes, worse sleep, and bigger mood swings than anyone ever. And it's going on 15 years now that she's been menopausal.

We have a hardship committee, which pays the dues of any member who has run into difficulty and can't afford the dues. I'm on the committee. One of the other committee members moved away, and I was unaware that this woman had been appointed to the committee until we got a request to review.

The member requesting assistance wrote that he and his wife had spent their savings on IVF attempts earlier this year, and now he has discovered that he is losing his job. This is what the committee was set up for.

Well, the drama queen and her husband have no children (good choice). She's vehemently and loudly anti-population growth (I don't know that her husband ever had a voice in the matter). Anyway, she voted to deny the assistance request, because she disapproves of what the guy spent his savings on. That's the only reason she gave, and there's been no reasoning with her.

I pointed out that last year's recipients were a guy who has no job and is incapable of holding a job because he's a total idiot, and a woman on disability who blew her budget on a fantastic sound system. And you want to deny this guy because he wanted to have a child? Her response, in effect, "Yes. No one should have children, let alone blow their savings to make one."

The woman is past reason. Pardon me while I go bash my head against a wall.
.

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

1988 Bylaws again

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Yesterday I went to NJ to visit Daughter and Hercules. The drive down was in Labor Day shore traffic, and it took me almost five hours. Coming home late at night took 2.5 hours. I stopped at the all-night gas station in the village, where I saw Harriet, a woman I had worked with on the fire department rescue squad. We had two years of catching up to do, so I was a lot later getting home.

I had read in the newspaper that the fire department and rescue squad were desperate for volunteers. She says they might go under, and if the village has to contract for professional firefighters and EMS, our taxes will go through the roof. (I'm already paying over $500/month in local, county, and school taxes, and I get the senior and widow's discounts.)

I spent all day today making updates to the Mensa bylaws. Our proposed revision was reviewed by national, and they had some comments and suggestions. They keep changing the minimum requirements, and it's not easy to hit a moving target. In general, they had good things to say about what we'd sent.

The Republican convention is on TV, and I'm not really watching. I don't know who was speaking about a half hour ago, but I got the impression he was saying that the country is in terrible shape, and the person the Democrats propose to fix it is completely unqualified to do so.

Um, did he realize what he was saying? Did he really want to emphasize how bad things are? Does he think we can't figure out how they got that bad? I may need to look that speech up on YouTube or something. I must have missed something.
.

Monday, September 01, 2008

1987 Whence Worries; GNP; Oil Price

Monday, September 1, 2008

Driving around yesterday, I was listening to NPR on the car radio, and there was a lot of talk about preparations in N.O. and Texas for Gustav. The consensus was that evacuation was pretty much complete this time. They said that "People seem to be a lot more worried about Gustav than they were about Katrina."

I thought about that statement a long time.

There's something wrong with that thinking. It's like they forgot two centuries of history. They forgot what actually happened three years ago.

The folks of New Orleans have been through hurricanes before, some even bigger than Katrina. (Even I have been through a hurricane in Biloxi, as a child. When the eye passed over, my mother opened the house door and quickly slammed it shut again because the street was full of snakes. I remember that part. Which has nothing to do with this. Sorry.)

New Orleans would have survived the wind and rain of Katrina as well as they'd survived all the others. They know how to do it. It wasn't the direct effect of the hurricane that hurt them. It was the bursting of the levees.

So, I don't believe they're "a lot more worried about Gustav than they were about Katrina." I think they trust the levees less. They've lost faith.

That's a significant difference.

--------------------------------

Also on NPR, someone was talking about how the GNP is up, and that's supposed to be good. Higher productivity. But is it really? I wish I could remember who was talking about it. I wasn't paying a whole lot of attention, but there were a few things that struck me. (Hmmm. Maybe it wasn't NPR today. Maybe it was PBS yesterday. Maybe I should pay more attention to my life.)

We work hard to make money. We want money to buy things. We make more things so we can make more money so we can buy more things. The things we make have to be sold, or nobody gets any money. So we are sold things. We buy things things we are sold (where "sold" means being convinced we must have them).

It expands - a circle, a cycle, that gets bigger and bigger.

In the end, by working harder to make more things so we can buy more things---

---We are trading our leisure for things.

That's what "GNP is up" means - that we've traded away more leisure.

This is good?

--------------------------------------

I found out why the fuel oil company send out the offer letter with so little time to respond.

If I hadn't been sick, fuzzy in the head, they wouldn't have gotten away with the trick.

They didn't want people to have the time to the research. If I hadn't been whacked, I'd have researched it before responding. It's what I do. I can't believe I didn't.

I looked it up yesterday.

Turns out the local average current retail price of fuel oil is about $.80 CHEAPER per gallon than the lowest price they offered. So they're going to contract with their supplier for 800 gallons of oil for me at the current wholesale price, which is less than the retail price, and then sell it to me for their usual markup PLUS $.80 more.

NOT a good deal for me.
.

Sunday, August 31, 2008

1986 Things I Learned Shopping Today - 2

Sunday, August 31, 2008

I needed printer paper. Office Max often has paper on sale in quantity, like 6 500-sheet packages for $20 or less, so after the craft fair I headed for Office Max. There was an unusual amount of traffic, and I somehow ended up in the wrong lane, and found myself making the turn for Wal-Mart. I shrugged and decided to see if they had paper, and maybe another like the flattering $10 cotton blouse I'd bought in Baltimore a few weeks ago.

Big mistake.

The place looked like a cyclone had hit.

I forgot about back-to-school shopping.

I did some back-to-school shopping way back when, but I never threw things on the floor when I decided against them. I folded stuff and put it back on the shelf exactly where I'd found it, or put it back on the hanger and on the rack. The right rack. In the right spot. I suspect Daughter did, too.

Our local W-M is usually pretty neat (in contrast to the usual shoppers), so it's easy to find one's size. Today the shelves were mound on mound of wadded-up clothes, and most of it nowhere near its mates. There was even female clothing on shelves and hangers in the men's section.

It looked like people had carried things around looking for other stuff to match, and if they were unsuccessful, they just dropped them wherever they happened to be standing at the moment.

I found where the blouses I liked should have been, there were a few there, but they were also scattered all over everywhere else, too. I have no idea if there was one in my size. I gave up looking after sorting through a few heaps on the floor.

I did get paper.
.

1985 Things I Learned Shopping Today - 1

Sunday, August 31, 2008

I went to the New Paltz craft fair today. There are annually two major craft fairs, the biggest is in Rhinebeck (moneyed area) in the spring, and New Paltz (college town), quite a bit smaller, is in the fall. In neither case are we talking home-made pre-holiday trinkets.

Rhinebeck has some spectacular stuff, but New Paltz is better juried. At Rhinebeck I have seen things that I know to be manufactured and imported - things I've bought from China or Tibet through eBay. I don't know how they were allowed to slip in. In New Paltz you are more likely to see the craftsman in the back of the booth actually making items. Everything in new Paltz is hand made ---hand carved, printed, painted, spun, woven, embroidered, blown, wrought, glued, dried, beaded, strung, built, quilted, recorded, sewn, designed, soldered, whatever.

I usually buy too much that I don't need, because it's all so beautiful.

Today I learned that if you wear a hat with a brim that hides your eyes, you can look at things without making eye contact with the sellers, and wow, you buy less. All I bought today was lunch, and some biscotti.

Open letter to craft fair organizers: All the other stuff is pretty well mixed. Wood, fabric, metal, glass, jewelry - all nicely mixed and scattered throughout four or five medium-sized tents and multiple aisles of stand-alone booths. So why oh why do you put all the scented stuff (spices, candles, oils, craft foods, sauces, dips, perfumes, soaps, all the odiferous crafts) all together in one huge tent? By the fourth stall (of the sixty-four in the tent) I couldn't smell or taste anything anymore. It all ran together. By the sixty-fourth, I had a pounding headache. I can't imagine what it must be like for the people who have to spend all day there.

Open letter to ALL fair organizers: Thank you for providing free parking, and for the kids to direct us to open spaces. But why oh why do they direct people who arrive at, say, 3 pm to the far end of the south forty? By mid afternoon, the folks who arrived early have left. The closer parts of the lot are nearly empty. Why not let us look for spaces there, instead of making us walk for a half hour past empty space after empty space, even entirely empty sections, to the gate? The only explanation I can come up with is an attempt to prevent cross-traffic, but since it's all one-way anyway, I don't see where that matters.

Oh well. I enjoyed the day, even if the french fry guy didn't have malt vinegar, at least he had gravy.
.

1984 Superlatives

Sunday, August 31, 2008

I am so tired of screaming superlatives. "They" are now calling Gustav the "Storm of the Century". Oh good grief! We've only eight years into the century. Call it "the Storm-of-the-Century-So-Far" if you want. Somehow in my mind I connect this tendency with that "everybody gets a trophy" mentality.
.

Saturday, August 30, 2008

1983 Jane and the Dragon

Saturday, August 30, 2008

I love "Jane and the Dragon". It's on my local NBC affiliate at 9 am Saturday, and I've been known to get up early on Saturday just for Jane.

I love the stories, the characters, the animation (the expressions and tiny movements are perfect), the colors and shading, everything.

You can watch an episode here: http://www.qubo.com/jane_show.asp
.

Friday, August 29, 2008

1982 Oh, Come ON!

Friday, August 29, 2008

On behalf of all women, I am insulted by McCain's choice. I'm sure there were many more qualified candidates, so his choice of this particular one seems very disingenuous.

Does he really think Hillary's pantsuit brigade is so easily swayed?

At least she isn't Black. Then I'd have to be insulted on behalf of Black males, too.

(It wouldn't be so insulting if she were at least well known and/or highly experienced, if she brought more to the table than gender. Alaska is suing the federal government over the designation of the polar bear as endangered, because it might hurt oil drilling. So I guess she takes the proper Republican stand on energy, anyway.)

(Note - a lot of Mensans were excited, until they found out it was Sarah, not Michael.)
.

1981 Breakthrough

Friday, August 29, 2008

I know a lot of people who are in or have been in some kind of counseling or psychotherapy, from myself to Jay, Daughter, several current friends, and more. Something I've noticed is that those who are, seem to need it least. There are a lot more who aren't "seeing someone", who should. We're all a little warped. The healthiest people are just more likely to admit it.

An aside - when I was in college and dating Ex#1, he and his social group considered any type of counseling to be an admission of weakness, that a "real man" never admitted any emotional problem. When Ex#2 and I were in marriage counseling, he asked me not to let it slip to his father, because his father would be disgusted, think him a wimp, that he couldn't control his life or his wife.

The big change since the '70s, when I was in intensive analysis, is that back then talk therapy was the path to realization. Now it seems like medication is the first choice. That's the effect of insurance companies - they'd rather pay for pills than ongoing (no end in sight?) therapy.

I do agree that there are some conditions where medication is most effective. But I insist that there are others where medication fixes nothing. It just covers things up.

Most of us carry a lot of emotional baggage, things that people said to us or did to us in the past, that affect how we react now. It's for that kind of problem that medication is merely coverup, and where talk therapy is most effective and necessary. Unfortunately, most talk therapy seems to consist of "what happened, how did you react, why, what could you have done differently" and so on. Trying to change behavior, to change reactions.

That's often not the problem.

The problem is that we believed what other people have told us about ourselves.

People with enormous influence when we were most vulnerable told us we were stupid, or worthless, or incapable. That we were fat, or ugly (like when my mother described my nose as "all over my face"), or it was always our fault when things went wrong. And then when things did go wrong, as they inevitably will sometimes, we accepted it as proof that we are stupid, incapable, ugly, worthless. Maybe it doesn't show up front, but it's always there in the background.

So we believed them. We incorporated their judgment as part of our self image.

In these cases, the goal of talk therapy should not be simply to change behavior, but to lead to a realization that those people were WRONG! They told us lies to make themselves look good. Their need for control, their need to win, caused them to define us as lesser, and we believed them.

If we believed them, it is not proof that we were stupid, only that we trusted them. We were vulnerable. It starts when we are very young, the self-deprecation ground is broken, and from then on the predators out there recognize us as fertile ground.

The breakthrough comes when we realize that they lied to us. They were wrong, not us. When we are able to look at ourselves through our OWN eyes, not theirs, and realize that the real "me" is quite different from what we had been told we are, then we are able to finally be ourselves --- the good, strong, smart, capable, generous, creative, nice person we are, but they didn't want us to be.
.

1980 Dating Thoughts

Friday, August 29, 2008

A certain early-20's-something blogger (a very nice-looking, intelligent, funny guy) has decided to try online dating, and has put his proposed profile out for comment. Almost all his 35 commenters have told him not to mention booze and bars so much. It sounds like that's his main interest in life.

Having read his blog for the past year, I'm aware that he has other interests, but bars and booze do seem to be the only way he knows to socialize. That means most of the girls he's been meeting are also boozers and barflies. I'm not surprised that nothing works out. I recommended that perhaps he needs not to change his profile, but to change his lifestyle. Other social activities might yield and ultimately attract more of the kind of women he wants to meet.

That got me thinking about how I've met most of the men in my life, and how would I go about meeting a man now (if I were in the market, that is).

I'd never realized it before, but ALL of the relationships I've had that were at least temporarily satisfying were with men I met either through work, or through Mensa.

With the guys I met "on the street", so to speak, it seems like right from the start it was work keeping it going. Of course there was something about him that attracted me, and kept me trying, but there was a lot of head butting and eye rolling on both sides until finally I (or he, but usually I) gave up.

I think it was a matter of similar experiences, education, taste, opinion, and values. I think I was more likely to find that similarity in a coworker or Mensan.

Interesting.

(Of course, it's possible I'm just too demanding and stubborn, and will compromise only so far, but I like me that way.)
.

Thursday, August 28, 2008

1979 Fuel Oil Deals

Thursday, August 28, 2008

I finally got the "deal" letter from my oil company, you know, where you can lock in a maximum price for the winter's fuel oil by paying up front for a set number of gallons. It arrived just before I left for last weekend, and I didn't look at it in detail until today. The deadline for signing up is tomorrow!

I normally use about 800 gallons per winter. The way it used to work was that they'd offer a maximum of say $4 per gallon maximum. So I'd sign up and hand them a check for $3200. Then when they delivered the oil, they'd charge my account whatever the price was that day, but no more than $4/gal. So if the price dropped to $3.50, I could end the winter with money left over that rolled over into the next winter's account.

The choice was to take it or leave it.

This year they've got a lot more choices, and with a head full of phlegm I'm having a terrible time trying to figure it out.

  1. I can sign up for Price Cap, which means I'll pay no more than $4.99 per gallon, less if the price drops, due at delivery. I have to pay $127 to sign up for this.
  2. I can enroll in EZ Pay, which spreads fuel bills over 10 months. If I didn't also sign up for Price Cap above, I'll pay whatever the price is at the time of delivery. If I did also sign up for Price Cap, the maximum is $4.89 per gallon, or less if the price drops. I don't know how they figure out what the monthly payment is, and I think it's weird that the price is lower even though they get their money later.
  3. I can pre-purchase 800 gallons at $4.54 per gallon paid up front in a lump sum. I gather this is not a cap, it's a flat price, so if the price drops below $4.54 I lost the bet.
  4. I can pre-purchase 800 gallons at $4.64 per gallon, to be paid in five equal payments, the first due up front, otherwise the same as #3.

I'm going a bit crazy trying to figure it out. The old "just plain cap" was obviously a good deal. But being offered four different prices like this is confusing. It's a bet. If I go with option #3 and the price drops lower, I lose.

It looks like their price is determined not so much by the market as by the payment plan.

I've pretty much decided on #3, IF they will let me put it on a credit card, because it'll take me 10 days at least to put together $3632, and they'll want the money by tomorrow. If they won't take the credit card, then I might go for #4.

Whatever, I obviously have to go to the oil company office today. I'm dripping from the nose. I'm breathing through my mouth not so much because of nasal congestion as that breathing through my nose makes me sneeze. Attempts to talk or laugh make me cough. But if the freakin' oil company sends out offers like this with ONE WEEK to figure it out and get your response and check back to them, well, they deserve to be exposed to my germs. So there!
.

1978 Weekend Escape Photos

Thursday, August 28, 2008

I mentioned the view from the room. This photo shows four of the six window panels on one wall. That wall met another wall at a less than 90 degree angle, came to a point in the corner, and that wall had the same set of windows, which made it feel like the room was hanging out there in the air. This photo makes it look gloomy outside, but I think it was just the camera, or reflection on the glass. It was actually very sunny. I took other photos of the room and out the windows, but all the others have bad reflections on the glass, or The Man in them.


Us at Mall of America. Go ahead and laugh. I chopped out all identifying characteristics, and cropped the biggest identifier off the bottom. No, not that - his legs. They're very long.
Mary and me again. Why do I look so fat? Could it be the 10 pounds I've gained in the past year? Ten pounds on me is a lot, because my legs are so short. Sigh. Back to the celery sticks, I guess. And NO MORE Starbucks frap crap. A minimizer bra would help, but I can't breathe in them. Maybe if we just pushed 'em together more toward the center?



The shirt he chose for me, in an attempt to pass me off as a fan. I liked it a lot better than the jerseys other women were wearing. He's got good taste.

.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

1977 Backlog of Photos

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

I've been using a disposable digital camera (which takes terrible photos, by the way), and you can't download from a disposable, so I had to wait until it was full to have the pharmacy folks put them on a disk. So there's quite a backlog here.

Actually, if it weren't for the IRS, we wouldn't have them today. I'm sick. My head is full of virus. I wouldn't have gone out at all today (I wouldn't have even got dressed), but I absolutely had to mail some tax stuff, and the pharmacy happens to be across the street from the post office.

I hope the tax stuff gets where it's supposed to go. My head hurt, so I just sort of made up an address for the envelope.

The flamingo flock in a rough part of my side yard:

There are 30 of them, in four different colors.

The flowers from the handsome biker:
The Moroccan ewer comes up to mid-thigh on me; the tips of the flowers were over my head. There's more than a dozen stems there. I guess some are hiding behind others.

The view up through the cleared woods to the house:


Me, after melting through a day at the Renaissance Faire, and enjoying a breeze:
The kid who took the photo was very tall, shooting down on me. That works to smooth out my neck, but it does terrible things to my body. See what I meant about the laces gaping by the end of the day?

And that's some of the things I've mentioned in the past few months. (I've got to get the REAL digital camera in action.) Next, A few photos from last weekend. Very few of those came out, and those that did have The Man in them, and I don't have permission to put his face here. Tsk. (No, I didn't ask. Because I know what the answer would be.)
.

1976 Check Your Tires!

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

This is a 20/20 segment on tires. I didn't know that tires dry out sitting in the warehouse. (I did know that certain gases, like those given off by electric motors, would make rubber brittle.) After about six or seven years, there's a danger of tread separation at highway speeds.

So, one would think there's no problem, since you usually have to replace the tires every few years anyway, right? Wrong. Stores are selling tires as new that are already 10 or more years old. They're unused, but in no way new!

This clip tells you how to find and decode the manufacture date. Now pardon me while I go out and crawl under my car.


[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
Ch_CBgcX_20&eurl=http://videos.komando.
com/2008/08/23/check-your-tires/
]
.

1975 Weekend Escape, Sunday

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Sunday, another room service breakfast, more milk for the refrigerator. We had noticed on Saturday that there was an aquarium at the Mall of America, according to the signs, "the world's largest underground aquarium", which had The Man snorting, "Just how many underground aquariums are there in the world?" So, we decided to go back and check it out. We stopped at the airport on the way to the mall, so The Man could check his bag.

The aquarium really wasn't all that big, I've seen larger, but yup, sure 'nough, those others weren't underground.

They seemed to specialize in sharks, swordfish, turtles, and rays, and it was one of those tubes you walk through with the fish swimming over your head. They did have some cool fish I'd never seen before, some really weird shapes. The Man commented that it was proof God had off-days, too.

We rushed out of there at 1:45 to go to the airport. Our flight departure time was 4:27 pm, and he had to return the car and all.

We got to the gate area a hair before 4. Delta. In all my years of travel, I have never seen any airline pull as underhanded a trick as Delta did on Sunday afternoon. It was amazing.

It was a small plane, one of those with 2 seats on each side of the aisle, and all one class. Maybe 80 seats or so? We had assigned seats, right from the moment the reservations had been made. But apparently the flight had been badly oversold. There were about 20 angry people at the gate desk, who apparently had tickets but couldn't get a seat assignment.

The airline started making announcements every few minutes begging people to give up a seat for $200 and a seat on "the next flight to NYC" (note they didn't say JFK). The Man checked his Blackberry. There WAS NO flight, not Delta and not any other airline, until the next morning, AND the next morning's flights were all full anyway, AND they went to La Guardia, not JFK. Good luck getting back to your car. And locating any checked baggage, which would have gone to JFK on this flight. Nope. $200 isn't nearly enough. There were apparently no takers.

At 4:25 I poked The Man and pointed out the window, "Um, notice anything missing?" We're supposed to depart in two minutes, and not only are we not on the plane, there's no plane out there.

At 4:27, Delta announced that the flight would be "delayed two hours. The new departure time is 6:27 pm." No explanation for the delay.

People grumbled. Many gathered up their stuff and left, presumably headed for restrooms, or restaurants, or out where they could smoke. The Man joked that we could go back to the mall. There happened to be a bar right next to our gate, so The Man and I took a table in there, where he had a beer, I had hot tea, and we both had a sandwich.

It turned out to be a very lucky choice. At 5:40, Delta announced that our flight was loading. They rushed everyone who happened to be in the gate area onto the plane, closed the doors, and moved us out away from the gate within minutes.

I was shocked. What about all the people with confirmed assigned seats who were going to show up at 6 pm, and find the plane gone? It's likely that the folks who were still in the gate area were the oversold folks, hanging around hoping for something to crack. A flight that had been oversold by 25% took off with at least 10 empty seats - at least that's how many we could count from our seats in the middle.

This is about the dirtiest trick I've ever seen from an airline. You've got too many people? Well, just get rid of a bunch of them. I can't imagine what Delta had to deal with when all those people showed up and found out the plane had left without them.

It gets weirder.

We arrived at JFK and followed the signs to the baggage carousels. There were only two, both Delta. There was a group of people at one of them collecting their bags, but it wasn't our flight. We waited and waited, all the other people left, the sign never changed to show our flight, and no more bags came out. Apparently nobody else on our flight had checked bags?

By now it was after 10 pm, close to 11. Everything in the terminal was closed. There were no people around. We finally found a man with a employee badge and asked where the bags from our flight were. (He didn't speak English very well, and the ensuing conversation was frustrating.) He told us we were at the wrong terminal. This is terminal 3. That flight landed at terminal 2. The Man said that he just got off the flight, at THIS terminal. The employee insisted no, our flight had landed at terminal 2 two hours ago (the original arrival time). The Man was close to exploding. "The flight was delayed. I know where I landed, and when I landed!" But it was obvious we weren't going to get anywhere with the old man, who continued to insist we had arrived at a different terminal two hours ago.

We supposed that it was possible that although we got off at terminal 3, maybe the bags had been taken to terminal 2. So The Man set off to check. He came back with his bag a half hour later. It had been circling a carousel all by itself. We were lucky it was still there.

Due to bad signs at the train terminal, it took a little over an hour more to get to the car in the long term lot.

We needed gas, but both of us were low on cash, and it took three stops in Queens to figure out that none of the gas stations open at 1:00 am would accept a credit card unless you were willing to leave it in the tender care of the attendant while you were pumping. At the third station I dug out a forgotten $20 bill from the bottom of my purse, and we used that.

I've noticed that when The Man is pressured, he needs to eat. He gets tense. Maybe it's a blood sugar thing, maybe not. But it's a good idea to feed him when he says he's hungry. It was another hour to the hotel parking lot where we'd left my car.

Back when I booked the flights, I had figured that the plane would land before 8, and I'd be home by 11 pm. But now it would be 2:30 am before we got to my car, and that would be without feeding The Man. He was concerned about my driving home so late, so tired, so without consulting me, he called the hotel where my car was waiting, and made a reservation for both of us.

I finally got home at about 11 am Monday.

Somewhere along the line, I picked up a virus. Hot throat, coughing, running nose, aching neck and back muscles.

But, I had a really good time. I can't wait to do it again!
.

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

1974 Weekend Escape, Saturday

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Saturday morning we had a late breakfast in the room. I got my usual two eggs sunny-side-up with toast and bacon, etc. He got scrambled eggs, and, this I don't understand, cereal. Two or three boxes of cereal arrived, with three pints of milk. He's lactose intolerant. He didn't eat the cereal. When we left on Sunday, there were six pints of milk left in the refrigerator. Duh? I didn't ask.

Then we went to Mall of America!

I had been hearing about this place for literally years, about how big it is, and how it has water slides and a roller coaster and all kinds of amusement park rides right inside! I was excited to actually be going there.

Well, yeah, it's big. But somehow, when you've built up something in your head for so long, the reality never meets expectations.

Take a big mall near you, a two-story one. Now make it four or five stories. That's one piece. Now copy it three more times, and place them around an open square in the middle, like a fat "+" sign, or a donut made out of rectangles. In that open center, pack an amusement park and throw a roof over it. And that's pretty much it.

What impressed me most was that there were gazillions of stores, and they were all open. No empty slots. The rent there must be astronomical, and most of the people seemed to be just walking around, the stores weren't really all that busy, so I don't know how they manage to survive.

The other thing that impressed me was The Man. There were only two stores he was interested in, one that sold PBS Lake Wobegon stuff, and the other was the "Vikings Locker Room" (or something like that). And I know he hates walking. "Drive to the deli across the street" kind of hate. And he is quintessential man, he doesn't "shop", he "goes and gets it". But he gave me the full walking tour of the mall. We must have put miles on his shoes, and he never once complained. I love when he does stuff like that for me. I guess that's why I fall in love with him all over again every time I see him.

We bought me a Vikings shirt in the Locker Room. A very nice one. Photo tomorrow, I promise.

An early dinner, a change into fan gear, and then we walked the several blocks to the stadium. It's completely enclosed, domed against the Minnesota winters. The game was at 7 pm I think, but he wanted to get there early. I hadn't asked if we had "good" seats. It didn't matter to me. All I knew was that they were season tickets.

Turns out they were two of "the four best seats in the house". Bottom row, centered on the 50-yard line, behind the Vikings bench.

I know absolutely nothing about football, but I enjoyed it anyway. I enjoyed his reactions. And the seat happened to fit me perfectly.

At the end of the fourth quarter, the score was Steelers 9, Vikings 10. The Steelers were pushing down the field, and there were four seconds left on the clock, when suddenly all the Steelers guys ran off the field and another bunch ran on. They were going to try for a field goal.

And then, and then --- the Vikings called a time out.

The Man freaked. Four seconds? Time out? Hey, why not give them time to get organized and set up, hey?

Well, the Steelers made the field goal, and won, 12 to 10. The Man may never recover. For the next 36 hours, about every 15 minutes, he said "Four seconds, and they call a time out? I don't get it." He kept asking me to explain it, like I might have an answer. It was cute, but one didn't dare laugh. Sympathy definitely required.

That evening in the hotel bar, a scout for some other team, a player who has a superbowl ring from a few years ago, The Man knew who he was, was sitting next to The Man at the bar, and they had an interesting conversation. The other guy couldn't figure it out either, except that it was a pre-season game, so it didn't really matter, and maybe they wanted to try something different. Who knows what.

Then end of day. I had huge blisters on my littlest toes from all the walking in the wrong shoes.
.

1973 Weekend Escape, Friday

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

We flew to Minneapolis on Friday, arriving in mid-afternoon. The Man had reserved two rental cars, one a sedan and the other a sport convertible. He'd decide which to choose depending on the weather when we arrived. I was a little disappointed when he decided on the sedan (it was a bit cool), because the convertible happened to be one on my "possibilities" list. He didn't know that. Tsk.

He took me on a driving tour of the city, showed me around. Everything seems so new. There are some really nice apartment and condo buildings. I don't much care for apartments, but I could actually see myself living in many of those. (Well, ok, a summer home!)

I'm always impressed with the accommodations The Man provides. This time it wasn't a suite, didn't have a Jacuzzi or a fireplace, or a second bathroom upstairs like other places we've stayed. It was just a large room with the usual sitting area and desk. BUT! It was on the 30th floor, in a wedge that sort of stuck out from the main bulk of the building. The two "wedge" walls were windows, about 30 feet of glass altogether on the two sides, coming to a point, with a wonderful view of the city. Amazing. It included a complete room service breakfast each morning. Photos tomorrow, I promise.

Dinner at the hotel, and then a walk to an NFL-ware store a few blocks from the hotel. It was one of The Man's favorite stores, and he was very disappointed that it was going out of business. He wanted to find something for me to wear to the game on Saturday, but they had very little left, so he just bought a few hats to add to his collection.

Drinks at the hotel bar, then collapse.
.

Monday, August 25, 2008

1972 Minneapolis

Monday, August 25, 2008

I was in Minneapolis this past weekend. I drove south Thursday evening to stay closer to JFK airport that night, met The Man Friday morning, and we flew to Minneapolis Friday, arriving before dinnertime. Got home this morning.

I love Minneapolis. The "city" part is small. As you approach it on the highway from the airport, it looks like someone tossed a handful of building seeds into a field, and watered them well after they sprouted. Tall beautiful shining buildings, clean streets, friendly people, plunk in a small cluster in the middle of the flatlands.

The photo above is me, and Mary Tyler Moore tossing her hat. She was on the corner half a block from our hotel. This is a cellphone photo taken by The Man. I had taken a disposable digital camera, so there will be other photos when I take the camera in to the pharmacy and have them put on a disk (you can't download from disposables yourself).

The purpose for the trip was a pre-season Vikings game (Steelers) on Saturday, and a visit to Mall of America.

More in subsequent posts. Right now, thanks to Delta Airlines, I'm dog tired.
.

1971 Visibility, Part 7 - the arbitration, Part 2

Monday, August 25, 2008

[Continued from Part 1] So the battle is on.

The problem of externals exposure existed not only in the particular product that had been copied, but throughout The Company's products.

A group was pulled together in White Plains to act as the coordinators and first level interface between the legal eagles and the software labs. They did most of the prep work for the attorneys. Four "Litigation Labs" were set up, northeast (us), southeast, west coast, and the other side of the world. Our jobs were many.

We received code from the competitor, and tore it apart to identify the copied portions. That, actually, was the reason for the high building security. We reviewed every manual for every product, to identify exposed internals and direct the publication departments in removing those references. We reviewed all new design documents to ensure that proper user exits were provided, and no new internals were exposed. We translated "legalese" into terms the lab programmers and design folks could understand, and translated lab concerns into terms the attorneys could understand. We educated pubs people and programmers in the whys and wherefores of the new rules. We had final approval on all new releases, and were very strict - schedules be damned. (I was finally in my element!)

I, personally, had responsibility for compliance of 35 products in 5 programming labs: 3 large operating systems and 32 major applications.

Now, the saying is that if you have a hammer for a tool, everything looks like a nail. The first claim of the competitors was that it was the manuals, the publications, that exposed the internals. So when corporate set up the departments to contain and correct the problem, they recruited pubs people. That whole top layer in White Plains were pubs people. They wanted the manuals cleaned up. All presentations and lab education was aimed toward what should be documented, and what should not. We in the Litigation Labs were not allowed to put together our own presentations or classes - we had to use foils developed by them and approved by the attorneys. At first, the only people we were to work with were the pubs people.

Fine. I agree we had to start sensitizing the publications departments. BUT - the folks in White Plains seemed to think that when the pubs were clean, the job was done.

I was shocked. The problem was not simply in the publications, it was in the design! Internal control blocks were exposed to the customer because no other means for debugging or plugging in had been provided. A few of us in our litigation lab had come from programming and design, and I was able to convince them that unless the design area in particular was sensitized to the issue, the concept of "black box", they were going to continue to design transparent functions. This would put the pubs people in a tough spot - design is going to continue to hand them transparent customer interfaces, which the pubs people would then not be allowed to document.

We HAD to get to design, too.

Well, surprise. Everyone who had come from design understood the problem, but none of them were willing to take it on as an issue. Do the assigned job and get out.

I fought it, all the way. Eventually everyone in White Plains also understood that the problem was larger than initially thought. We still had customers out there plugging right into the code. We had to identify them, and provide proper exits, otherwise we were still exposed to the argument that all that code was an external interface. We had to teach the design departments to provide proper "plugs", and hide everything else.

Everybody understood, that is, but Sue. Sue was one of those people who somehow found herself in rarefied air, and knew deep down that she didn't belong there. She seemed to be deathly afraid of being found out. She constantly "ran scared", freaked out daily. I heard, but don't know as a fact, that her previous department wanted to get rid of her, but she wouldn't accept transfers, so when White Plains was looking for pubs people, they figured that was one job she wouldn't turn down. I also heard, but don't know for fact, that she was hired in because she was Asian, and they needed someone who could read Japanese, and then after she got there, they discovered she could neither read nor speak Japanese. It could be both.

Sue was, of course, my interface in White Plains. I'm lucky that way. She was a complete ass. I had called a meeting with design in Endicott one time, and she decided to attend. The topic was the design for some function whereby they required that the customer know how certain algorithms worked and what bits were set in certain control blocks in order to use the function. This was an obvious violation. I was sitting down with the designers to explain what was wrong with it, and to figure out with them how we could redesign the function so that the internal operation would be hidden. All it required was a front-end, and we were talking about what the front-end could expose.

Well, Sue objected. She insisted that the design was fine as is. All they had to do was NOT document the customer interface. "Just don't say this, and don't say that...." She didn't understand that that would make it completely unusable, and force the customer to reverse engineer the code to use it, which is the worst scenario imaginable.

Because her desk was in White Plains, she decided she outranked me (she didn't), and she thought this meant she could interrupt me and "correct" me at will.

In short, I finally lost it. She and I ended up both standing on opposite sides of the conference room table, leaning on the table with our faces about a foot apart, screaming at each other. The lead designer called a break, and during the break, he said that I'm right, anyone can see that, and, um, how 'bout we end the meeting now, and resume in two hours without telling Sue. Which we did.

I spent four years fighting with her. My coworkers had occasional dealings with her, and they asked me how I could stand it.

In the third year, my manager put me in for promotion. It had to be approved by the director. The director asked the person in White Plains who worked most closely with me whether I deserved promotion. Of course, Sue said no.

In the fourth year, my manager put me in for promotion. It had to be approved by the director. The director asked the person in White Plains who worked most closely with me whether I deserved promotion. Of course, Sue said no. (Sue wasn't getting promotions either. Had I been promoted, I'd have been a higher grade than she.)

And then The Company, who under previous CEOs rarely fired anyone - they'd shift people around until they found the right spot - warned the world that there would be major cuts in personnel. "RIF"s. Reduction in force. The Mid-Hudson Valley was going to lose several thousand jobs. Transfer somewhere else now, or die.

They offered packages to people who were willing to quit or retire. The "easy out" retirement package included lifetime medical, and five years added to your time, and a very healthy severance check (for me, it was a year's salary), and assistance finding another job. If you didn't volunteer and were RIF'd, you got next to nothing. Just fired.

Our litigation lab headcount was under White Plains, not the Mid-Hudson valley labs, so no one in our group was going to lose a job (although I understand two people were strongly advised to take the offer since it would probably be the best they'd ever see). However, since our payroll paperwork was handled in Poughkeepsie, we were eligible for the package anyway. The cuts would be announced on April 1, 1993. Jay and I were planning to get married, so we waited until the end of the day on April 1. If he was RIF'd, I'd keep my job. If he still had a job, I'd volunteer for the retirement package.

More than nine thousand local people lost their jobs that day, but Jay wasn't one of them.** On April 2, I went in to my manager, and told him I was taking the easy out, and he freaked. Six of the ten** in the department planned to take it, including him. He said that he was afraid that if Martha and I left, they wouldn't let him leave.

We all kind of figured that the spotlight was going to turn on headquarters sometime, and since we were under their headcount, we'd all be sacrificed before any of them, and there'd never again be a package as good as this one.

And that's why and when I left the company. In constantly pissing off Sue, I broke rule #10.

------------------------

** The next year, 1994, they did it again - RIF'd a few thousand more people, including Jay and the remainder of the Litigation Lab. From April 1993 to April 1994, about 13,000 local folks were out of work. The real estate market tanked. Job losses rippled throughout the surrounding communities. Thirteen thousand computer professionals were turned loose on a depressed job market, and even if they did manage to find another job, they couldn't sell their house to move.

The second severance package was much much MUCH less attractive. I did really well taking the first one when I did.

Remember Peter, from Visibility Part 4? Uh huh. And Sue? Disappeared. I don't feel at all guilty gloating. For once, I got something good at the right time.
.

Sunday, August 24, 2008

1970 Visibility, Part 7 - the arbitration, Part 1

Sunday, August 24, 2008

Well, after the events of the previous posts, I'd about had it with that particular product area. I had achieved my goal - I had a lot of technical respect, people listened when I spoke up in meetings, but it looked like nobody was going to give me any credit for anything I did. Fooey on them.

I heard via the grapevine that there was a new group being put together in Poughkeepsie, reporting directly to Corporate in White Plains, and they were looking for people who were good at reviewing documents, and understood external interfaces. I contacted the manager of that group, and he requested my transfer.

What we were working on was highly confidential. We had an entire building to ourselves. No Company programmers or designers would be allowed in our office section of the building. If they had to come for any purpose, we received them in conference rooms in an unused part of the building. We ten had our own raised floor with any hardware we wanted. We had a kitchen. We had huge offices with windows! The external entries were double-locked, and there was an internal work area with more double locks, cameras, and motion detectors. Our manager was on loan from Corporate, and reported directly to a Director.

When I later left The Company, I was enjoined for ten years from even talking about what we had worked on, and if I wanted to apply for a job with any other company in the same business, competitor or not, I had to get the approval of The Company first, as part of the conditions of my retirement.

The ten years are up. I can talk about it. I can't imagine that it could possibly be of any concern at this point.

Imagine a black box with several holes that you can plug things into. Certain information goes into the box, and certain information comes out. If you know exactly what the input should look like, and what the output looks like, and what the box does, then you don't need to know what's inside the box to plug things into it. That's "plug compatible."

It's perfectly acceptable for a competitor to create a box, hardware or software, that does the same thing as your box. They can copy the inputs and outputs, the "plugs", also known as the externals. What they can't copy is what's inside the box, the internals.

A certain non-American competitor had developed a large mainframe very similar to (well, exactly like) ours. They wanted to build an operating system for it also very similar to (well, exactly like) ours, so that they could move customer applications off our hardware and onto theirs with the promise that everything would work exactly the same. "Plug compatible." And that's what they did, and they started shipping it to their customers.

Within weeks of the competitor's first ship, The Company service centers started getting strange calls for assistance. The callers were getting operating system error messages that said, essentially, "If you see this message, call [The Company] service center at [phone number]....", so, of course, they did. The weird thing was that they were not running our hardware or software. Hmmmm.

The halls of the White Plains legal department were filled with the clash of armor being buckled on, the rattle of swords against shields, and the neighs of 747 steeds champing at the bit.

In a distant country halfway around the world, heads were already rolling.

Sounds pretty cut and dried, eh?

Nope. First off, international copyright law, especially as pertains to computer software, wasn't very clear in the late '80s/early '90s. Also, what court had jurisdiction could affect the outcome.

Plus, the competitor had a defense that was difficult to counter.

Their argument was that our customer manuals document everything. We listed every control block down to the byte and bit level. We did not provide convenient exits for customers to add or change function - instead we allowed them to actually change internal code to branch out to their added function, including the ability to manipulate those internal control blocks. In a misguided attempt to satisfy everybody, we had opened the entire operating system to the customer. In a nutshell, since no one was able to determine where and how the customers were manipulating the internals, the internals had become externals, and therefore it was not only permissible to copy them, it was necessary in order to achieve plug compatibility.

They had copied pretty much the entire system. (Many programmers, when they're proud of something they wrote, put their names in the comments. A cursory glance at the competitor's source code, when it was provided during legal discovery, revealed names of The Company programmers. Either the programmers were moonlighting with a competitor, or....)

The parties decided to go to arbitration.

[Continued in #1971 Visibility, Part 7 - the arbitration, Part 2, coming soon to a blog near you.]
.

1969 Visibility, Part 6 - the search tool

Sunday, August 24, 2008

At the end of the compatibility project (previous post) we had a lot of "design approved" external incompatibilities which may or may not adversely affect customer applications and automated procedures, but no one had any idea which were serious. No one had any idea what the customer actually depended on (which in my opinion they should have known BEFORE deciding which ones would be allowed).

When I took incompatibilities to Peter's group, I wanted to be able to argue for or against them with some idea of the impact. So I wrote a search tool, that would scan applications and procedures for use of those particular commands or response texts. It was slow and cumbersome, and produced reams of output, very little of which was actually useful, but it was sufficient for my needs, because I knew exactly what I was looking for. I obtained actual applications and procedures from other installations within the company, who pretty much replicated customer usage, and got a pretty good idea of an incompatibility's impact.

Peter's design department was charged with writing a guide for customers, so they'd know what to expect, what they'd probably have to watch out for or change when they ported to the new operating system.

Somebody, somewhere, somehow, decided that my scanner should be released to the customers. Somebody came up with the description "automated identification of incompatibilities", and it sounded good.

I argued strongly against it. It's too slow. It's too cumbersome. It puts out too much useless information. It's just for my own use, I never expected anyone else to use it. There's no documentation with it. Hey folks, it's really REALLY bad! I really don't want my name associated with this dog.

It was released anyway, on the recommendation of Peter's group. With my name on it. Because they didn't want to do the work and they thought this was the easy way out.

And then the customer reviews started coming in.
We can't figure out how to use it.
It's too cumbersome.
It's too slow.
There's too much useless information that must be sifted by hand.
There are too many false hits.
This is a piece of garbage.
... and on and on, from every customer who received it.

And my name was on the damn thing. Product-wide visibility.

Sorry, Peter, but this didn't make up for the other thing....

But thanks a lot anyway.
.

Saturday, August 23, 2008

1968 Visibility, Part 5 - compatibility testing

Saturday, August 23, 2008

So, the line item to change all the externals to make them compatible (previous posts) between the two systems began. Although I was in a design and usability department, because I owned the externals and everyone knew about the test generator I had written, I was asked to do the testing.

(By the way, testers don't get the credit they should. That'll be another post someday.)

There were many line items being added, functions in the old system being ported to the new system and hardware. I would be ensuring not only that all the old externals were compatible, but that all externals for the new would also match. That's every variation and combination of every option on every old and new command, error condition, and operator info situation under every possible condition.

It will mean nothing to anyone but another tester, but in one year, I wrote, ran, verified, and compared results on over 350,000 variations on TWO operating systems.

As new code for new functions was added to the system, I waited until it had been fully functionally tested, and then I ran the compatibility tests for that function.

If I found incompatibilities, I wrote them up and passed them to Peter's group, who then decided whether it had to be changed to be compatible, or whether there were compelling reasons to allow an incompatibility. We had to keep track of those to warn the customer later that if their application depended on this message or return, they'd have to change it.

If I found an actual bug in new code, I'd write a PTM (Program Trouble Memo) which would go to the development group responsible for coding of that function.

If I found a bug in old code, code that had been in the system for ages, I'd write an APAR, which would go to the design group owning that function. (One of these days, I'll do a post on the origin of APARs.)

For that release of the operating system, there were 30-some testers testing new function, and 10 testing old function. Keep in mind that I didn't get the code to do my tests until it had been thoroughly tested and approved by those 40-odd people, and by then the programmers in the development groups had figured their work was done, passed test, and had moved on to other things.

I found bug after bug. Old code, new code. During development and testing of that release, something like 1800 PTMs were written, and of those, over 1,000 were written by ME! After the programmers thought they were finished. Some functions looked like they hadn't been tested at all!

So besides all the testing, simply processing PTMs was a full time job. Plus I wrote about 100 APARs.

By the time I was finished, that system was CLEAN! It had been a superhuman effort.

You'd think I ought to get some kind of recognition. I kinda thought so.

Nope.

By finding so many bugs so late in the cycle, I pissed off the programming groups by messing up their schedules, making them redo what they thought was finished.

By finding so many missed bugs after they had "thoroughly" tested and approved the new code, I pissed off the testing departments. I made them look like crap - and from what I saw, what they'd handed me, they DID do a crappy job.

Everybody hated me. Because I was right? Because I made them do things right? Because I exposed their inadequacies? Whatever. The release slipped schedule, and it was all my fault.

All my fault? Because I did my job well? Because I found a lot of bugs? You didn't have to fix them all, you know. Oh, I forgot, you did have to fix them to keep up the pretense that quality matters.

Yeah, I forgot Quality Rule 1. Schedules are always more important than quality.

Minor "quality" awards had always been given to the tester who found the most bugs. They skipped the award for that release. After all, I wasn't a tester. I was in design.

Lots of visibility, but all the wrong kind.
.