Friday, March 16, 2012

3488 Catching up on medical

Friday, March 16, 2012

Good judgment comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgment.

----------------------------------------------------

I was trying to remember when I had the last urine culture, and realized that this journal is where I go to quickly find out when I did what, and I haven't been putting stuff in here.

So, to catch up. In the past month I've had a urine culture (but the doctor doesn't seem to have received the results, and that's why I was trying to remember the date), a blood panel which showed good kidney function and within-limits blood glucose, an abdominal x-ray that shows the same stone in the same position and it hasn't grown, ultrasound of the kidneys which looked good except that it showed mild hydronephrosis on the right and moderate hydronephosis on the left.

Hydronephrosis is kind of like an enlargement or swelling caused by urine having been retained in the kidneys. It's not a very serious thing in itself, but may indicate another problem.

So last Tuesday I had a spiral CT scan of the abdomen, NO contrast, thank you. My next urologist appointment is April 7.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

3487 Bucha Bits

Thursday, March 15, 2012

In the history of the arts, “Anonymous” was a woman.

---------------------------------------------

We've all seen those tattoos gone wrong. The husband of a friend of mine is a tattoo artist. The only examples of his work I had seen were on his wife. Beautiful stuff, but naturally that may or may not be a true representation of his everyday work, since he had time and incentive.

Yesterday I saw some photos on his Facebook page. I am impressed! I knew he was a true artist in several media - he does wonderful work in metal, for example, and in designing and making incredibly detailed medieval and Japanese warrior armor. I now find he is an artist of the highest caliber in ink, even when the canvas is not his wife.

If you are ever in the Kingston/Woodstock NY area, and you'd been thinking about getting a tattoo, I recommend him highly. He's not only talented, he's a gentleman in every sense of the word. Check him out: http://www.facebook.com/eddempseytattoos - click on "photos" on the left, then on "album II". I am most impressed by photo 119, near the bottom, the shoulder armor. It LOOKS like metal!

-------------------------------

The TSA says that people 75 and over will no longer have to take off their shoes or endure pat-downs. They figure old folks are a low risk.

Hmmmm. Not any more.....

Say we've got a 27-year-old passionate radical bent on revenge who wants to carry a bomb. Say he's got a 76-year-old grandfather whose wife died three years ago, and who has just been diagnosed with prostate cancer. Hmmmm. We now have incentive to talk to Grampa about a little mission he could spare his grandson from.

Don't get on any planes with old codgers!

--------------------------------

Check out KhanAcademy.org. Scroll down for a list of topics they have lessons on. They're amazing! Wikipedia has an informative entry on Khan Academy.

--------------------------------

You've heard of iPhone 4's Siri, the lady who answers your questions. She has a sense of humor. There are many video clips on YouTube wherein people (usually males) ask her questions (the most common being "How much wood can a woodchuck..." etc., for which Siri has several amusing answers). In this clip, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_SRhnis6f8&feature=fvwrel, Siri learns that Steve Jobs has died. Yeah, it's a faked Siri, but of all the clips I'd seen, this is the funniest.

--------------------------------

Some guy is suing some theater chain (Google it. I'll wait) because they don't allow you to bring in food or drink, and the prices at the concession stand are like 40 times what you'd pay in a grocery store.

I understand why theaters want to restrict what people bring in. Some folks are ridiculous slobs. They'd bring messy or stinky stuff, three course dinners, get pizza deliveries, throw chicken bones on the floor, spill scalding coffee on the people in front of them, and so on. At least if they control it, the theaters know what to expect.

As to what they charge, it doesn't bother me because I don't buy any of it! I'm not forced to pay their prices. It is not necessary to eat during a movie. Sheesh. The high concession prices keep the ticket price down, and if the folks who think they have to eat want to subsidize the price of my ticket, that's fine with me.

I guess I've been conditioned by my past. All those young folks out there don't remember pay toilets (mostly phased out beginning in the mid-70s). They were everywhere, including stores, restaurants, and bars, and if you had to go you were forced to pay. You had to put coins into the door to get into a stall, and if you were out of change, too bad. Now THAT's a ripoff! (And no, the urinals in the men's room did not require payment. Women bore the brunt of that one.)

Note - I would love to sue theaters for what they sell - not over the prices, though. I'd like to force them to sell only things in packaging that doesn't rattle or crinkle! It's not fair to charge me for a movie I can't hear over fifty guys shaking Junior Mints out of a box.

-------------------------------

Voters at my old house vote down the school budget year after year. Year after year the school board redoes it, and keeps it to a 7% increase. Voters seem to be happy with 7%. Last week I checked my records. The school tax for the old house is now 150% what it was in 2005. Note that my income has increased by maybe 8% since 2005.
.

Sunday, March 11, 2012

3486 New York on eBay

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Life is not like a box of chocolates. It’s more like a jar of jalapenos.
What you do today might burn your ass tomorrow.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The state of New York has opened a store on eBay to sell surplus stuff, in huge lots. Last week they had a lot consisting of hundreds of ancient desks of various sizes and shapes, another lot of a gazillion mismatched tables, and a couple lots consisting of multiple heavy trucks in each lot, most of which were, uh, "well used" to be polite. There are few photos and scanty descriptions. If you win the bid, you have to go to the fairgrounds in Albany to pay for and and pick the stuff up, and you must take the entire lot.

I don't know who is buying this stuff. I'd love to know what they're doing with it.

There's a lot out there now that they're calling "maintenance items", consisting of
33 - Magazine/Media Racks
1 - 48" x 84" Glass Door and Frame
2 - 36" x 80" Wood Door
1 - 4 Drawer Metal Filing Cabinet
2 - 2 Drawer Metal Filing Cabinets
1 - Prezel Warming Machine (typo? pretzel?)
53 - 16" Street Brooms
20 - Dust Pans
1 - Pallet Ground Glass for Road Repairs
1 - GE Glass Refrigerator Shelf, Model# WR32X1510
28 - Boxes Copy Paper 8 1/2" x 14" - 5000 Sheets Per Box

"Maintenance items?" Huh? Sounds like they started out with the brooms and dustpans, and then just started throwing more junk on the pile. Eight bids on that lot, currently over $200.

Who puts these lots together? The same people who want the doors might also want the cabinets, the rack, and maybe even the warmer. But what on earth would they do with the huge pallet of ground glass? Why would anyone want the refrigerator shelf? And nobody uses legal sized paper any more.

And yet people are bidding on it.

They also have "metal canopy arches" that look interesting. It's a set of two half-circle frames that you'd stretch canvas over. They are photographed in front of some railroad cars, and look large enough to park boxcars under. But in the description, they are described as 30'' Wide x 10'' Deep x 14'' Tall. There are 37 bids on them as of now, with the high bid slightly over $2,000.

I sent them a message asking if they meant FEET, not INCHES. I haven't got a reply yet. I'm tempted to place a nuclear bid of, oh, say, $10,000 to ensure I win them, and then when I arrive to pay and pick them up, refuse to pay on the grounds that they won't fit in the back seat of my car like they said they would. Snork.
.

3485 Looking back at Mother

Sunday, March 11, 2012

The rich buy assets. The poor have only expenses.
The middle class buys liabilities they think are assets.
--Robert Kiyosaki --

----------------------------------------------

Everybody, when they have a baby, is determined to not make the same mistakes their mother or father made with them. They vow that "I will never" blah blah, whatever they remember from their own childhood as a crime against them.

They are unaware that even as they avoid the old mistakes, they will make new ones of their own.

Especially with the first child, when they are unsure, they begin to realize that they've already made mistakes before the kid is even walking, they begin to realize that it's not as easy as they thought. They realize that parents are human, and there are other parts of life to deal with, other pressures, and they can't always make the right decisions and do the right thing all the time. Other crap interferes. Parents aren't so god-like that they know everything about everything, everything that's going on. The best you can do is try to make the right decisions and actions righter than the wrong ones are wrong.

And then they look back at their own parents, and think "gee, maybe they weren't so bad after all, they did the best they could at the time", and they finally brush off all those little scars to their psyche they'd been carrying around for so long.

I just wish it hadn't taken my daughter 36 years to have her first baby.
.

3484 Spoilsport

Sunday, March 11, 2012

It's not enough to come up with a good idea; you have to come up with
the good idea at the right time. Many people with a good idea present it too soon,
before anyone is ready to accept it, and then drop the idea when they meet resistance.
When the world is ready, someone else puts forth the same idea
and gets all the credit.
-- Silk --

--------------------------------------------------------

I was the spoilsport at work.

There was a couple, co-workers, who were dating. This was before cell phones, before home computers. We had an intra-company internet, but there was no connection to "*the* internet". We had terminals connected to a mainframe, and company mainframes all over the world were connected to each other, and each person was assigned personal space on huge disk drives in the computer center (a.k.a. virtual disks).

Anyway, these two who were dating had been sending emails to each other, specifying in graphic x-rated detail what they were going to do to each other that evening. They were storing the emails on their virtual disk space on the system disks. I guess neither of them were smart enough to remember that they worked in a community of 250 system programmers, who had written the system they were using.

Someone changed the permissions for their virtual space. Anybody could read their emails. The "how to" was passed from person to person throughout the product area. The contents of the emails was the #1 whispered topic in the cafeteria and behind office doors.

When it finally got around to me, I was horrified. I think that was an absolutely rotten thing to do.

The day I found out, I saw the female of the pair walking past my office, so I called her in and told her something has been going on that she should know about, that it had been going on for some time throughout the product area, and no, I didn't know who started it. Then I linked to her virtual disk and his, and opened hers. I didn't say anything else, just walked out of the office and left her to it.

It was a spur-of-the-moment thing. Maybe if I had thought about it longer I'd have been less direct, like hinted to one or both of them that it was easy to grant access to other people's disks, easy to read others' email. But I'm not sure they'd have picked up on the implications.

She was very ashamed. They were married less than two months later. I guess that redeemed her.

--------------------------------

Another incident cost me a friend.

Mark (not his real name) was one of about seven of us who were hired together (for me it was a re-hire) and we hung out together, bar after work once a week, hikes on the weekends, and so on. They were mostly just out of college, so I was 16 or 17 years older than they, but I still fit in. I was a bit more emotionally intimate with most of them because sometimes they saw me as a mother-figure, and came to me for advice. Mark, Linda, and I were especially close.

Linda (not her real name, either) had a crush on Mark, but none of her flirtation was returned.

Mark shared a house with two other guys. Eventually, one of the housemates, Dan, was transferred to a distant plant.

Mark and Dan kept in touch by email.

Thereafter, every time you saw Mark, he had another Dan story to share. Dan said this, Dan thinks that. He thought everything Dan said or did was enormously funny and interesting. He tacked photos of Dan to the bulletin board over his desk, cut out snippets of Dan's emails and tacked them up, decorated it all with ticket stubs and ski lift tickets.

When you went to his office, he'd direct your attention to the latest addition, and tell you the story that went with it.

People started to snicker.

I walked into his office one day, was immediately directed to the latest Dan photo, and suddenly impulsively had enough. That was 25 years or so ago, but I still remember exactly what I said.

"Mark, you have to stop doing this. This (waving at the bulletin board) looks like a shrine to Dan. It looks like something a twelve-year-old girl would do when she has a crush on a rock star. You've got to stop talking about him. People are starting to wonder exactly what the relationship is. I personally don't care, but it's hurting you out there (waving to the hall)."

His face turned dark, he ushered me out of his office, and he never spoke a single word to me ever again!

When he saw me in the hall, he turned his face away from me. He stopped coming to the group social activities if I was there. We worked together, but all communication was through an intermediary. When I transferred to the litigation lab, he was manager of a product area I was heavily involved in, but he never came to a single meeting. He always sent a member of his department to represent him. In later years I'd occasionally see him in the halls when I visited his area for meetings, and I'd always say "Hi, Mark", and he'd always look straight through me, as if I wasn't there.

He was still friendly with the other members of our group, although a bit cool, so I always knew what was going on with him. Once he took the shrine down and stopped talking about Dan, there were no more rumors, no more giggling. As far as any of us know, he never dated anyone local, male or female. I heard Dan had married and had some kids.

I suspect Mark and Dan's relationship was just friendship on Dan's side, and something more intense on Mark's side.

I haven't seen him or heard anything about him since they closed the plant twelve years ago and all our coworkers scattered to the four winds. I often wonder if Mark ever came out of the closet, even to himself.

--------------------------------

Oh, that last sentence reminds me. Mark bought a house, and like all new homeowners he was excited and gushed about it at lunch. (A lunch spent ignoring me.) Someone asked him, "How many closets does it have?" and he counted up, asked if a pantry counted, answered seriously, and everyone at the table cracked up. I believe he honestly didn't know why they were laughing.
.

Saturday, March 10, 2012

3483 Plowing

Saturday, March 10, 2012

The meek will inherit the earth when the bold finish destroying it.
(...nothing to do with this post!)
----------------------------------------------------

The Hudson Valley Draft Horse Association will be having their spring plowing event April 28th. I used to go every second or third year. In 2010 I was in Morocco, and last year I had the kidney thing, so it's been four years since I've gone, and I've missed it. Four years ago it was very disappointing. There weren't as many teams, and they didn't seem to have as many events. I'm fussing over whether it's worth a six-hour round trip.

I love hairy-legged draft horses, especially Friesians. I love to see them work; they seem so eager and intelligent. And powerful but gentle.

I love the way there'll be proud young men with perfectly matched prancing teams decorated in gorgeous shined silver and brass, and old men with a team consisting of a old horse and a mule in cracked leather harness, and in the plowing and the pulling contests, the old men and their ragtag teams just lean into it with no fuss and DO IT, blowing everyone else away. I love the way the horses seem to know what to do without guidance. I love the way that when you look at a draft horse, he looks back, and studies you, and seems to form an opinion.

The plowing events are graded on the straightness and evenness of the furrow, and speed will break a tie. The man has both hands on the plow. It's his job to keep it in the ground. The horses/mules know all the rest.

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri0f3aIIC34]

This is a Friesian, sex on the hoof!

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBWlOzwfN7k&feature=related]
.

3482 My Gay Confusion

Saturday, March 10, 2012

The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
-- Henry Kissinger --

---------------------------------------------------

I sort of understand men who prefer men. I suspect there are a lot of different causes, from gender misassignment at birth, through genetic brain and hormonal cross-wiring, to early emotional trauma or conditioning. Lots of different causes.

"Acting female" is mostly social conditioning. Yes, most little girls are less aggressive, more empathetic, and a bit quieter than most little boys (with a wide range and lots of overlap). There are differences due to wiring. But those differences don't include floppy wrists and whining. Most of the superficial differences between men and women are due to social conditioning and expectations.

Here's the part I don't understand: Why do some gays act in a way that even women find silly? I don't understand gay guys who out-fem women. You know, the floppy wrists and high voice and rolling eyes and frilly clothes. And the bitchiness and shallowness of the worst female cliches. It's an insult to all women that those guys think that's what defines a woman, and an insult to all men if they think that's what men find attractive.

I don't get it at all. It doesn't make any sense to me.

If I were a gay male and wasn't interested in sex change surgery, then it seems like I would want another gay male. But another gay male is likely to be attracted to a male, not a female. So why would I want to act like a female, and an ultra-female cliche' at that? Why would I act like a ten-year-old girl playing movie star, or like a Vegas stripper? And why would another guy who prefers men want a fake woman, and a bad fake at that?

I don't understand. It just doesn't make sense to me.

Maybe I'm projecting my own preference. I like men. And I like my man to be bigger, smarter, faster, and more aggressive than I (and that's not easy). So maybe I think anyone who wants a man would want that, too, at least to some degree.

I know a few gay male couples (and several singles), and of all the couples I know, and all of those I've seen in the grocery store (there were a LOT in the mid-Hudson valley), none of them were floppy-wrist types, and none were likely to parade in feathers and spike heels. They seemed quite happy to be male. They just happened to be attracted to other males. (Note that in the couples, one is usually "softer" than the other, but not so much so that women didn't find him attractive.)

Sigh. Ok, writing about something makes me think, and I've thought about it for the duration of a post, and I still don't get it.
.

Sunday, March 04, 2012

3481 They are MAD!

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Re healthcare: Stupidity is a pre-existing condition.
-- Bill Maher --

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I just saw a commercial for J.C. Penny that says you can return anything, any time, for any reason, with no receipt!

Holy crap! That means you need buy one season of new clothing, then never buy clothing again! Just return the winter stuff in the spring, and the summer stuff in the fall, repeat, repeat. You'll always have new clothes, always in style, always the right size if you happen to lose or gain weight, for no more than the usual year-to-year increase in price.

JCP is crazy!

--------------------------------

It reminded me of my one short stint as a suburban housewife in St. Louis in the '70s. I knew a lot of women who considered it normal to go buy new throw pillows, rugs, vases, china, whatever, when they were having a party, and then return it all after the party. I knew one woman who changed her very expensive living room curtains every year, simply by returning them and picking out new. She figured if it was allowed, then she'd be foolish not to do it.

I don't understand.

I still think JCP is nuts, and rather than courting my patronage, they have discouraged it. I figure they're not throwing returned stuff away, that would be prohibitively expensive, it probably goes back on the sales floor, so anything I buy there is USED! ...and I don't know by whom, for what, and whether or not they had lice or roaches or bedbugs.

JCP has gone mad!
.

3480 It's so difficult to remain calm.

Sunday, March 4, 2012

He’s got a lot of depth on the surface, but deep down he’s shallow as hell.

-------------------------------------------------

Man, I'm beginning to wonder about this "random" thing. The green quotes are getting eerie.

-------------------------------

I have a house phone, came with the cable/internet service, but I never use it (use only the cell phone), have never given out the house phone number. The ringer is turned off, and the recorded message says I don't use this phone, ringer is off, I never answer it, and I rarely check the messages, so there's no point in leaving one. The only people who call that phone are wrong numbers, spammers, and politicians.

Two posts ago I raged at Ex#2. He had emailed me wanting me to call him or send him my phone number so he could call me, and my response was "I hate the phone, use email". (Aside - most minimally aware people would understand that I don't want to give him my number.)

A week ago I changed the outgoing message to shorten it, but it still says "I don't use this phone." Well, today I checked for house phone messages, for the first time in about three months. There were only two messages, both from Ex#2, after I had asked him to use email. He must have found the number online or something. (Daughter doesn't even have this number - no point, since I never answer it!) He obviously heard the recorded message, that I don't answer this phone and rarely check the messages. And yet, he left TWO messages a day apart asking me to call him ASAP.

(If you'd like to hear the message, call area code 732, exchange 566, number 6532. And then tell me what would lead anyone to not only leave an urgent message, but to leave two!)

The idiot hears only what he wants to hear. Any wonder why I don't want to deal with him?
.

3479 Soft spots in the concrete

Sunday, March 4, 2012

What doesn't kill us makes us bitter.
-- Chuck Lorre --

---------------------------------------------------------------

I'm not too happy about the above green quote turning up on this particular post, but I guess that's what "random" means.

-------------------------------

Sometimes (ok, often) I wonder if I'm hard. I don't feel sadness about things like people, strangers, killed or injured in fires or tsunamis or tornados or whatever. I do contribute money or material to disaster relief when it will make a difference, to prevent further suffering, but I don't get all weepy about what's done.

However, the baby girl found in a field in Indiana, that hit me. Hard. I don't know why this particular story upset me so much, but it did. I want to DO something, but I don't know what. Like fly to Indiana immediately, and hold her, and adopt her.

Very young children orphaned in disasters do get to me. I would be less upset if they had died.

That boy in Newburgh, NY, who managed to get out of the car when his mother drove off a boat ramp into the Hudson River, killing herself and the boy's siblings, he's not that young, but no child should have to deal with that, so I wanted to swoop in and love him. But I'm not so sad about the rest of his family.

I guess I don't find death as upsetting as life with pain.
.

Friday, March 02, 2012

3478 I will stay calm. I will stay calm. I will...

Friday, March 2, 2012

He always makes a good first impression; to detest him, you really have to know him.

---------------------------------------------------

A little background: To transfer stock, bonds, etc., you need more than a notary stamp on your signature. You have to get a medallion stamp, which you get only at a bank or a brokerage, because the medallion is backed by insurance for the value of the asset.

Last year, I asked Ex#2 to complete the transfer to me of some jointly-owned shares of stock that I got in the divorce some 30-odd years ago. I sent him the forms. All he had to do was sign them in front of a bank officer and get the medallion stamp, then mail them back to me.

Not so simple. He couldn't find a bank in south Jersey willing to risk their insurance by verifying his identity for that large a sum (which wasn't very large at all). Um, apparently not even the bank he'd been using for the past several years, which makes one wonder. It became a big deal on his end, involving many phone calls and visits to various banks, but he finally found a large enough bank and scraped together enough id to get the medallion. (They also made him open an account.) He then sent the forms to me, I got the medallion on my signature from the small community credit union I'd been using for less than six months, and the deal was done.

So, now, this morning, I got an email from him. He wants to sell the lake lots in Missouri that he'd got in the divorce. He asked me to call him! or send him my phone number so we could talk about it.

Uh uh. Ain't no way I'm talking to him on the phone! He natters, and attempts stupid jokes, interrupts, doesn't listen, and mishears. He objects to everything, he's infuriating, and on the phone there's no opportunity for me to cool down before being forced to respond, which I guarantee will be counter-productive and possibly damaging to my phone.

I suggested we discuss it by email.

Now, I'm pretty sure I completed a quit-claim on that property 30-odd years ago, and I guess he didn't file it because my name is still on the deed, but I can't get annoyed about that because I'd done pretty much the same thing with the stock transfer. He's got a buyer (at a loss, he says, which is odd because we bought the lots before the lake and roads and all the amenities were in, so they were dirt cheap in 1972, but no skin off my nose whether he's taking a bath or lying, and history says he's lying because hey, it's about MONEY!, but I don't care), so he needs me to sign the sale papers. Notarized, of course.

Summary of the email exchanges, omitting the infuriating parts:
He: Drive down here (three+ hours round trip) so we can go to a notary and both sign at the same time.
Me: We don't need to sign at the same time. You sign and get it notarized, then send the papers to me, I'll take them to the notary at my bank and sign, and send them back.
He: The bank won't notarize unless you have an account there.
Me: What part of "my bank" sounds like I don't have an account there? Besides, we're not talking about a medallion. They get sticky about medallions if they don't know or don't like or don't trust you. It's just a notary stamp and any notary can do it.
He: There's only one space for the notary stamp.
Me: Not a problem. The stamps can go anywhere, just so they touch the signature.
He: How 'bout I come up there and your notary can witness both signatures?
Me: (No! No! Please God, No! No!) Not necessary. Get your signature notarized, send the papers to me, I'll get my signature notarized, and send them back. Very simple. Three days with overnight mail.
He: Ok. I send them to [right house number, wrong street name], right?
Me: No. Send them to [my name, right house number, right street name, right town, right zip code, included all just in case, 'cause he's an freakin' idiot.]

Note that he's not signing at his attorney's office because he didn't retain an attorney. The BUYER drew up the contract - a quit-claim. Probably forms the buyer picked up at a stationery store. Sheesh.

And I'm a little nervous myself about the tax issues. Somebody has to pay a real estate transfer tax. Can we trust the buyer to do that? If Missouri requires proof, or fees for filing the deed, maybe. And even though it's (supposedly) "at a loss", Ex#2 should report it on his income tax. I have no confidence whatsoever that he will do that.

We're talking about the guy who didn't file federal income tax for several years because one year he forgot, and then he figured that since the gov'ment deducted the money up front and he never had to pay more at filing time, and nobody came after him for not filing, he didn't have to. Ever. Duh.

If he doesn't report the sale, I can get in trouble for not reporting it, either.

This is the guy who rented out three bedrooms in his seven room house, then claimed 1/2 of his mortgage, taxes, insurance, and utility payments as a business expense, AND since he rented to a succession of drug addicts and sleazeballs who paid the first and last months' rent and didn't pay another penny for the six months it took to evict them while they stole his mail and everything else nailed down or not --- so that every year he declared significant business losses on his income tax, equal to the mortgage+, so that he pretty much got the house free.

The IRS rules say that you can lose money on a business for something like only three years in a row, then it is no longer a business, it's a hobby, and you can't claim business expenses for it. But he scammed the feds and state for ten years, and bragged about how much money he saved on taxes.

The IRS rules also say that if you report crap like that, you get a reward of a percentage of the back taxes owed.

You have no idea how tempted I was. The reward alone would have been in the tens of thousands. But if I had reported his delinquency, Daughter would be upset, so I didn't.

I wish I had. I'm sorry the statute of limitations is up. But so help me, if I find out he didn't report this land sale on next year's taxes, I'll get him. Somehow.

(Of course, if it's REALLY a loss, then he will report it.)
.

3477 Lasers aren't just for cats.

Friday, March 2, 2012

If a Republican had nearly doubled the Dow and gotten
bin Laden and Qaddafi, he'd already be on the dime.

----------------------------------------------


.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

3476 Fairies

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

In Scott Turow‘s Burden of Proof, Sandy's daughters describe
his love life as “a tom-tom network of females wailing over
his shortcomings late into the night.”

------------------------------------------------------

Most representations of fairies show them with wings.

They don't really have wings of their own, you know. Not at home, anyway. They're actually built rather like ordinary humans, with the usual four limbs.

When Fairies go out and about, they call on dragonflies or damselflies, which pick them up and hold them about the waist with their legs. Dragonflies and damselflies are wonderfully maneuverable. They can fly up, down, backward, and hover with little effort. Because the insects are so slender, they barely show pressed close along the fairy's back, and because they are so light, the fairy can bear them easily when not flying.

On formal occasions, a rather vain fairy might call upon a butterfly to carry her. But that's a bit frowned upon, because the butterfly's body is wider, and will show around the fairy's sides, the work is much harder for the butterfly, and when they aren't flying, the butterfly is much heavier for the fairy to bear. All of which is a rather silly vanity considering that a dragonfly's wings are equally beautiful.

Next time you see a fairy (a real live one, not a drawing by someone who's never seen one), notice the wings, and the legs around her waist. The insect legs will look like ribbon laces binding her tunic.
.

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

3475 Flying

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

A guest for a while sees a mile.
-- Jewish Proverb --

--------------------------------------------------------------

You know how you don't hear about something for ages, and then all of a sudden you're exposed to it a half dozen times in two days, from wildly different directions? Sorta like deaths happen in threes, I guess. Anyway, a strange topic that's cropped up many places in the past few days is flatulence on airplanes, and how (although nobody ever admits THEY do it) awful and inconsiderate it is?

Oh, come on! It's not like people do it on purpose! It's the change in air pressure. Even the most delicate people who would otherwise considerately hold it can't hold it on planes. (TMI confession - I can't release gas unless I'm standing. I simply can't do it sitting, not even by tipping to one side. So every time I fly I'm in pain until we descend and the pressure evens up.)

Sheesh. A little compassion, folks.

And I don't believe that you complainers don't do it. Maybe you just think yours don't stink.

These are the same people who hate crying babies on planes. The air pressure change makes their little ears hurt and they don't know how to clear it. Compassion and understanding, please. You are hearing a baby in great pain! The parents have no control over that.

If the airlines did a better job of equalizing air pressure, both problems would go away.

We all ARE allowed to hate the idiot in front of us who reclines his seat, and the idiot behind us who kicks our seat, and the bastard who hogs the armrest and keeps shoving his elbow in our ribs. Now that, they CAN help.
.

3474 Intervention

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

"When a true genius appears in this world,
you may know him by this sign,
that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-- Jonathan Swift --

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'd also been hearing about another A&E show, that follows "Hoarders" on Monday night: "Intervention". Each week they follow the story of an addict, ending in an family/friends intervention. (How can these people not know what's coming? Sheesh.)

Anyhow, last night was the first time I'd watched it. The subject was a woman who was an alcoholic. I know a little bit about alcoholism. Ok. Bad thing. Yes, she's messing up her life, and the lives of her family and kids (boy 12ish, girl 20).

At the end of the show they had the usual intervention.

I got a little angry.

Sitting there in the room was a counselor, the woman's mother and father and three sisters, and her kids, and they're all telling her how her addiction is messing everything up.

Every single person sitting there, the parents, the sisters, the daughter, all except for the woman herself, the counselor, and the young boy, was pushing 300 pounds, at least.

A bunch of obese foodaholics telling an alcoholic how unhealthy her addiction is?

That takes nerve.

One kills quickly, the other slowly, but because it's slow, that's ok? What's that saying about the beam in your own eye? Well, I guess it's ok if you're outnumbered.
.

3473 Hoarders?

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

When you're overwhelmed and know not what to do,
you often do nothing.
-- Roi, on "Hoarders" --

-------------------------------------------------------------

The green quotes come from a file I maintain, and they're random. I set up draft posts ten at a time with the number in the title space and a quote at the top, and then fill in text later. So I'm amused that THAT quote came up for this post.

I've heard a lot over the past year about the A&E show "Hoarders" (Monday, A&E, 9PM, with reruns of earlier shows at 8PM and midnight) but I'd never seen it. So last week I found the website for it, and I watched all the full episodes they had online.

I was interested because when I tell people that part of my problem getting moved is that I have so much stuff that I have to sort through and decide what to do with, people get that sympathetic look with furrowed brow, figuratively pat my hand, and ask, "Are you a hoarder?"

I say no, I just have a lot of stuff. But I figured I ought to find out what they're thinking.

See, in my mind, a hoarder is someone who keeps "good" stuff because they think either there will be a shortage in that item some day, that it will become more valuable, or that they will be able to use it someday.

Jay was one of the third type. He saved all those dead computers on the theory that he could raid them for parts. I hoard books. I can't throw out a book I enjoyed. I hoard lipstick when I find the perfect color, because they will stop making it someday.

Well, "hoarder" is the correct term for some of those folks on A&E, but not all. Most of those folks are something else. I don't know what noun to call them, but they're just plain lazy and filthy. There's a difference between a carefully boxed 10,000 beer can collection taking over the basement and most of the house, and a mountain of dirty diapers and rotted food taking over the house for no other reason than laziness. One is an out-of-control collector, what I would call a hoarder, and the other is a slob, NOT a hoarder.

Jay was also a bit of the latter. When I moved in with him, I found a basement half full of boxes that hadn't been open since he'd moved from up Texas fifteen years before. I volunteered to go through them for him, and was horrified. Among the usual college textbooks and notebooks and high school science fair entries, unused ugly wedding gifts (first wife), and ratty stained rugs and cheap old comforters (that mice had raided for nesting materials), there was at least 500 cubic feet (that's 8'x8'x8')of junk mail, 90% of which had never been opened. Apparently he never threw any paper out, and when he moved he had actually packed it and moved it!

I've seen some royal slobs. There were some guys in college who never took the garbage out. They put garbage in paper grocery bags, and then just stacked them in a corner of the kitchen. When the corner got full, they expanded to the other rooms. The place stank of rotted food, and I hate to think what's happening to the floor at the bottom of the piles!

I know several Mensans who never throw anything but kitchen garbage out. Everything else that comes into the house stays. Every flat surface eventually gets covered with piles of stuff, and when it becomes difficult to open cabinets or drawers because of the stuff stacked in front of them, nothing ever gets put "away", and when they need something that gets buried, they just buy another --- which goes on top of a pile. You have to turn sideways to move around between the piles.

The first time I visited Jay's father's house, I found out where Jay'd got his tendencies. Piles and stacks of paper, magazines, catalogs, everywhere.

What amazes me is that nobody seems at all ashamed of it. They happily host meetings --- they just shift piles so people can sit. "My house isn't dirty, just cluttered." Are they hoarders, or slobs?

Roman's house is cluttered, too. I've seen him bring in the mail, open envelopes, and drop the junk mail and discarded envelopes on the floor. I do that, too, but then I gather up the paper and put it in the recycle bag, and take it out when the bag fills. Roman never picks it up. The discarded paper on his floor will get literally two feet deep before he notices, and then instead of discarding it, he neatly piles it against a wall. When he goes grocery shopping, he puts the bags on the kitchen floor and puts only the cold stuff away. The rest is left in the bags until he wants it. One time there was an awful smell in his kitchen. I thought a mouse had died, and picked up one of the bags to look behind it, and the bottom of the bag broke, dumping ten pounds of rotted potatoes on the floor. He's not a hoarder. Just a slob.

In my opinion, some people are 1.) pathological hoarders, saving anything and everything that they perceive as having some value. Some are 2.) accumulators, like those who build collections of particular things (like my 50-some teapots) and it gets out of hand. And some are simply 3.) slobs - like the folks with mountains of pure garbage rotting in the kitchen, mountains of dirty diapers in the bathroom, stuff that gets shoveled into garbage bags with no sorting even considered. The A&E Hoarders show doesn't differentiate. They treat them all the same, and I don't think they are the same at all.

The professionals on the show have this rule, that the "hoarder" has to make the decision whether something goes or stays. I got angry at last night's show. They kept waving junk in front of the old man for his decision, but if he said "Keep it", he got an argument, and they'd keep pushing and arguing until they got the response they wanted. It was clear that the only acceptable decision was "Toss it", and it was no damn wonder that he got angry and gave up and just said "Toss it" without even looking or thinking. I don't see that he "learned" anything at all. The producers talk a good line about the hoarder learning to make good decisions so they don't revert, but that's not how it is.

So, am I a hoarder?

Maybe. Probably of the accumulator/collector variety.

But absolutely not like what you see on the show.

After Jay died, I felt so alone in that house. I got a lot of money from his insurance. I used about 1/3 to pay off the mortgage, I invested 1/3, and then I sat and stared at the remaining 1/3. I was depressed. I'd rather have the him than the money. I didn't really want the money. So I spread it around. I bought stuff I wanted or liked. Maybe I was trying to fill the empty house, my empty life. Comforting myself with pretty things, things I liked to touch, wear, look at. Unusual or exotic objects with history, stories.

I wanted a real "Brown Betty" teapot. (Photo from http://www.brownbettyteapot.com/brown-betty-teapots.htm, where you can purchase them.) They make the best tea because the rounded shape makes convection patterns that brew tea best, and the thick walls hold the heat. I shopped Ebay. I bought one the right shape, but it wasn't brown. Then I found a brown one, but it wasn't real terra cotta. Then I found a bigger one. Then I found a real antique one. Then I found a Cardigan pot (no hole in the top, you fill it from the bottom). Then there were Japanese iron pots. Then --- things got out of hand. I kept buying teapots because I liked them.

I discovered haoris (kimono jackets, photo from http://www.ichiroya.com/item/list/004/, my favorite haori shop - if the photo has disappeared, go to the link and look around). They are beautiful, mostly silk, beautifully made by hand, useful, and versatile. I bought one, and loved it. Then I found a prettier one. Then --- things got out of hand. I have a closet full of the damn things now, each one unique, and each one prettier than the previous purchase.

My great-grandmother had a pair of antique Staffordshire dogs. (I got the picture from http://www.figurines-sculpture.com/pottery-mark-query-2-gold-dots-on-bottom-staffordshire-style-dog.html, because most places with pictures are selling the dogs, so the photos may not be around for long. This dog doesn't look exactly like Great-gramma's dog, but close enough.)

Gramma got one dog, Great-aunt Ethel got the other (hard to believe they broke up the pair!). I loved Gramma's dog, which went to Mom, then to my brother Duke. One day I went to an antiques fair, and found a pair of Staffordshire dogs similar to Gramma's for sale. I bought them. At another antiques fair a year or two later I found another pair that looked more like Gramma's, including the tiny hole in the back that my mother had told me she had put a gold chain in for safekeeping when she was a child and hadn't been able to get it back out. Of course, I had to buy that pair. Then I found some smaller antique Chinese knockoffs, which, being "fakes" weren't kept, and are now less common and therefore almost as valuable, but eBay sellers don't seem to know that, so they sell them cheap. I now own two pairs of Staffordshire dogs and three pairs of "Staffordshire" dogs.

Sigh.

And on and on. All kinds of pretty crap, and I love it all.

It's all packed up neatly in containers, or displayed on shelves, but I can't keep/move it all, and containers are taking up so much room that my house does, in fact, look like a hoarder house. Very little of it is junk. I'd like to sell or donate a large portion of duplicates or the stuff that I simply will never actually wear or use, but that takes effort and energy that I hadn't had. So, yeah, I've got a problem.

At least watching the hoarders show has energized me a bit. And living here with next to nothing in the house, and family across the street, has taught me that I don't need all that stuff to fill my life.

So, it'll happen. I guess. But not without a lot of angst.
.

Saturday, February 25, 2012

3472 Fourteen lost loves

Saturday, February 25, 2012

A well-tailored suit is to women what lingerie is to men.

---------------------------------------------

I now have cable. But even with a gazillion choices, there's still so very little on TV that I care to watch. Even "Big Bang Theory" is getting predictable - in the allotted half hour with so few narrowly defined characters, the story lines are getting repetitive and predictable.

It seems like not so very long ago, there were great shows on. I miss them. "Great" seems to be missing these days.

How many of these do you remember?

"Upstairs Downstairs" (British, PBS, 68 episodes, 1971 to 1975) - Man, that was great! Even in rerun it was spellbinding.

"Northern Exposure" (CBS, 110 episodes, from 1990 to 1995) - The characters were all characters, and the writing was amazing. Threaded through the wackiness was deep philosophy and respect. If you'd never seen it, I pity you. (Lots of clips on YouTube, but no few clips will give the whole picture.)

"Ballykissangel" (BBC, 1996-2001, later on PBS in the US) - A rural Irish village. We meet the people, and follow their intertwined lives. Some of the storylines were slow in unfolding, some were tight. One of the things that impressed me was the way one, two, or three episodes would be devoted to a particular story, and things didn't ever get tied up neatly at the end of the episode. It was like life. It was life. (This is where I learned how to pronounce the name "Siobhan". It's like "Shivon".)

"Dharma and Greg" (ABC, 1997-2002) - I adored Dharma and her parents, and their "why not" attitude toward everything natural.

"James at 15 (and at 16)" (NBC, 1977-1978) - You know, I remember nothing about this show except the kid's face, and that I loved it (the show, not the face). It was very realistic.

"My Name Is Earl" (NBC, 2005-2009) - I discovered this show only recently, but I'm including it here because they aren't making episodes any more. I didn't watch it when it was on because I thought it was just another show full of redneck jokes, but I caught a few late-night reruns, got hooked, and bought the entire set of DVDs. Again, I love the characters, especially Joy (I'm so glad I don't know her, but I love her from afar, and the actress playing Joy deserves an Oscar, so what if it's just TV), Darnell (his backstory comes out in bits and pieces, and it's fascinating), and Patty the Daytime Hooker. The quality of individual episodes varied; the best usually featured Joy. If you watched it and didn't love it, try again, you just caught a blah one.

"Ally McBeal" (FOX, 1997-2002) - Again, an interesting cast of characters (I'm noticing a pattern here). The setting was a law firm, but law was not the main preoccupation of the scripts. The people were. I especially loved John Cage, poor guy. And smarmy Fish's fascination with wattles. I was never all that appreciative of Ally herself, though. This was the show with the dancing baby, and Barry White, and John's frog in the firm's unisex bathroom.

"The Wonder Years" (ABC, 1988-1993) - I don't remember anything about this show except Kevin and Winnie. That, and the fact that I loved it and cried when the characters grew up and out of the show, but that was the best thing about the show, really - the characters grew up, and the storyline with them!

"Boston Legal" (ABC, 2004-2008) - I had never cared for William Shatner, ever. Never. Nohow. But Shatner as Denny Crane was perfection! His relationship with James Spader's character Alan Shore was amazing --- which was good, because the producers kept switching people in and out, nobody seemed to last very long. The writers had fun. In one episode, Denny, who had been increasingly showing signs of dementia, has won an especially significant court victory, and as he's walking down the hall surrounded by reporters (accepting acclaim being his favorite activity), he says, "You know, I was once the captain of my own starship."

"Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman" (syndication, 1976-1977) - Take a typical soap opera, remove it from mansions and penthouses, plunk it into trailers and apartments partitioned from run-down houses, and trade cocktails for beer. That was Mary Hartman's life. You either hated the show or loved it. But you sure did recognize the people and the situations. I loved it, of course.

"thirtysomething" (ABC, 1987-1991) - Oddly, I remember absolutely nothing about this show, except that at the time it resonated strongly with me.

"Newhart" (CBS, 1982-1990) - the show with the famous line, "Hi. I'm Larry; this is my brother Darryl, and this is my other brother Darryl." Dick Newhart was not really the star of this show. The oddball characters surrounding him and his inn were.

"Fame" (NBC, syndication, 1982-1987) - The real thing, with heart and grit. "Glee" should die of embarrassment. A sure sign of its value is that "Fame" was more appreciated in Europe than in the US.

"The Tracy Ullman Show" (Fox, 1987-1990) - Tracy Ullman may be the most talented person ever! The show consisted of short skits. Tracy could convincingly play male or female, young or old, big or little, could speak with any accent, and sang and danced. She was simply amazing. (The Simpsons got their start on this show, as short animated skits before or after commercials.)

I'm sure there were more shows I haven't listed. I'm remembering Flip Wilson. He and Geraldine were fun. And there's "Fraiser", of course, but that's in rerun so much now it may as well be a current show. Nope - I never liked "Cheers" or "Seinfeld". In fact I despised "Seinfeld". Those people were not nice. I don't like not-nice people. "Taxi" was pretty good, but limited. None of those reached the heights of the fourteen listed above.

Thinking about the list, I notice that I don't seem to be drawn to glamor or glitz. I'll watch legal, criminal, or medical procedural shows, but I won't miss them when they're gone. I'm drawn in by unique well-drawn but complicated characters. I like believably weird people who find themselves in believably weird situations in a believable storyline that grows in a consistent way. I prefer talk to action. I like to learn something, not in an academic sense - something about life and people.

-------------------------------

So, restrict yourself to shows no longer in production, and tell me what shows YOU miss most.
.

3471 Dominion

Saturday, February 25, 2012

A ditch can't be filled with dirt from its sides.
-- Jewish Proverb --

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Regarding the horrible new Blogger word verification on comments, !those messes you can't read!, here's the relevant discussion from the Blogger help forum: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/blogger/thread?tid=540e2fdfc8c15474&hl=en

It amazes me that some folks claim to have taken WV off and subsequently saw very few spam comments, so they figure it isn't needed anyway. I took it off for two days recently and was immediately inundated with spam. I had to turn it back on.

The only other option is to moderate comments, but I HATE HATE HATE when people do that because you don't get to read the comments of others before commenting yourself, and you don't see your own comment for an indeterminate period of time. I had a period of a few weeks when my comments weren't showing up, and I assumed that for some reason the moderating blogger(s) were deciding not to allow my comments through, so it took me a while to discover I had a problem with Google login and the comments weren't being accepted at all on moderated blogs.

If you are having difficulty figuring out the WVs for comments, there are some symbols next to the entry blank, one of which, the left-most one I think, resolves to "cycle through, give me another". You can keep clicking that until one crops up that you can actually figure out. You won't have to retype your whole comment, or take a wild guess that's rejected.

--------------------------------

The world uses 89 BILLION barrels of crude oil PER DAY. It's pulled out of the earth and burned. Every day. We know of the effect on the atmosphere, but what about earthquakes? I mean, we're removing a lot of lubricant. Has anyone with any knowledge expressed an opinion?

--------------------------------

Here's an article about a child in St. Louis, and what can happen when employers can pick and choose what to cover in health policies: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/columns/bill-mcclellan/article_35b5796c-7cc2-52e3-88c6-cc0050751f1d.html

--------------------------------

When I read this article - http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/21/georgia-democrats-to-propose-limitations-on-vasectomies-for-men/?iref=obnetwork - I thought it was a joke. You know, one of those "news" sites that spoof real news. But it's real!

Rep. Yasmin Neal, a Democrat from the Atlanta suburb of Jonesboro, planned on Wednesday to introduce HB 1116, which would prevent men from vasectomies unless needed to avert serious injury or death.

The bill reads: "It is patently unfair that men avoid the rewards of unwanted fatherhood by presuming that their judgment over such matters is more valid than the judgment of the General Assembly. ... It is the purpose of the General Assembly to assert an invasive state interest in the reproductive habits of men in this state and substitute the will of the government over the will of adult men."

“If we legislate women’s bodies, it’s only fair that we legislate men’s,” said Neal, who said she wanted to write bill that would generate emotion and conversation the way anti-abortion bills do. “There are too many problems in the state. Why are you under the skirts of women? I’m sure there are other places to be."

Personally, Neal said, she has no qualms with vasectomies.

“But even if it were proposed as a serious issue,” she said, “it’s still not my place as a woman to tell a man what to do with his body."

...

Earlier this month, Democratic Oklahoma Sen. Constance Johnson added then withdrew a provision to an anti-abortion bill that read "any action in which a man ejaculates or otherwise deposits semen anywhere but in a woman's vagina shall be interpreted and construed as an action against an unborn child." [Silk - Italics are mine. Um, doesn't the Old Testament say that, too? Onan's sin?]

In January, as the Virginia state Senate debated a bill that required women to have an ultrasound before an abortion, Democrat Janet Howell attached an amendment that required men to have rectal exams and cardiac stress tests before they could receive prescriptions for erectile dysfunction medication like Viagra. The amendment was rejected in the Senate, 21-19.
You go, girls! But do you think men are smart enough to understand what you're trying to tell them?

Perhaps women need to simply say to male legislators, you vote the way you have to, Dear, but understand that since I don't want a[nother] baby, and I seem to have no final say over that, there will simply be no more sex, of any kind. And, uh, remember you'll be up for reelection, so, uh, you'd better not get it anywhere else, either.

Sometimes I think that the next action will be to take away our shoes.
.

Thursday, February 23, 2012

3470 So, will anyone apologize to the hotel maid?

Thursday, February 24, 2012

Competent leaders have always understood the crucial difference
between public proclamations and private bargains.
-- Stephen Jay Gould --

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Remember Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the former head of the International Monetary Fund, the guy who planned to run for President of France, but was derailed when the NYC hotel maid accused him of rape? Remember how the case was dropped when the maid's veracity was questioned? Remember when a woman couldn't charge rape without two witnesses? Remember when she had to have a spotless reputation to be taken seriously, and even then the charges were dropped if she didn't have two black eyes and a broken leg? Oops, sorry, I got sidetracked a little there. Back to Strauss-Kahn.

From today's Bloomberg article in the San Francisco Chronicle:
French builder Eiffage SA filed an embezzlement complaint after an internal probe found an employee spent as much as 50,000 euros ($66,000) to pay for women to travel as far as Washington to have sex with Strauss-Kahn.

Investigators are trying to determine whether Strauss-Kahn knew corporate money was used to pay the women and whether he played an active role organizing sex parties he allegedly attended, or knew the women attending were prostitutes.

Prostitution and paying for sex are legal in France, while procuring prostitutes for someone else isn't

Strauss-Kahn was also questioned by agents charged with internal investigations of the French police regarding his ties to a regional police chief indicted in the affair.

Strauss-Kahn has denied wrongdoing in relation to the investigation and said in a Nov. 11 statement from his lawyers that he wanted to be questioned, "to put an end to the dangerous and spiteful insinuations" in the media.

"A lot of other people associated with this affair have been indicted," Mesnooh said. "Their links were a little more direct perhaps than the links of Mr. Strauss-Kahn with the prostitution side and the abuse of corporate assets side."
I don't know how he expects to get out of this one. It's not lowly women complaining this time, others will testify to his presence at the parties and to hotel trysts, he had to know the women were prostitutes, and he had to know someone else paid for them.

Of course, he might be one of those unfortunately too common men who regard ALL women as prostitutes or potential prostitutes, just that some are cheaper than others. Like "free" hotel maids.
.

3469 Catching up

Thursday, February 23, 2011

The mystery of love and life and death is really grander and more glorious
than human beings can grasp, much less legislate.
-- Fenton Johnson, 1996 --

---------------------------------------------------

I get angry at misleading headlines. Some headline writers oughta be sued!

"They" know a lot of people read only headlines. People skim headlines and read only the few stories that pique (note that's not "peek") their interest. Otherwise they get all their "news" and form their views from headlines.

For example:
Headline 1 - "Democrats protest religious freedom hearing". From this you might conclude that the Dems don't care about religious freedom and don't want it discussed. The real story:
"Democrats [are] saying they had been denied the ability to present witnesses who might support the government stance or speak for the rights of women to reproductive health coverage. They asked why women weren't better represented among the 10 witnesses at the hearing.

... there are also some Catholic groups and individuals who have come out in support of the president's approach. They were not there at Thursday's hearing."
That's an entirely different story from what the headline implies. The Democrats felt that the committee was not interested in women's views or in any testimony that was unlikely to agree with their foregone conclusion.

Headline 2 - "Bobby Brown Kicked Out of Whitney Houston’s Funeral". According to the story that followed, he was NOT "kicked out". He had been invited, and arrived with several people, was seated, and then was asked to change seats, to move, three times! The third time he was asked to relocate, he said to hell with this sh*t, went to the casket and paid his respects, and left. Nobody even suggested he leave. It was his decision, because he was by then getting angry, felt harassed, and didn't want to create a scene. So he simply left.

So why did the headline writer feel it necessary to say he was "kicked out"? That is inexcusable.

Headline 3 - "Not brushing teeth leads to cavities, brushing too often breaks teeth". Hmmm. From this one might conclude that brushing too often weakens the enamel or something.

Nope. In fact, "too often" has nothing to do with it. The real story (which few people would have read) is that there's some electric rotating toothbrush that's defective, and the spinning head can snap off and break teeth.

-------------------------------

Latest Duh - I read, not just overheard, this person WROTE it, that someone had won something "by a hare's breath". It took me a minute to translate that to "a hair's breadth".

-------------------------------

I am no longer watching the Repulsican debates. It's too scary. It seems like they're all using Rush Limbaugh's research staff now. The sheer weight of disinformation is staggering.
.